Gayatri Kembhavi1, Johanna Darrah, Joyce Magill-Evans, Joan Loomis. 1. Departments of Physical Therapy (G.K., J.D.) and Occupational Therapy (J.M-E.), and Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.L.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the use of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) to assess the balance abilities of children with cerebral palsy. METHODS: Thirty-six ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and 14 children with no motor impairment (ages eight to 12 years) were assessed on the BBS and the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM). Participants with cerebral palsy comprised three groups based on diagnosis (spastic hemiplegia, spastic diplegia who ambulated without aids, and spastic diplegia who ambulated with aids). A fourth group consisted of control subjects with no motor impairment. It was hypothesized that these four groups demonstrated a hierarchy of balance abilities. A one-way ANOVA was used to detect significant differences in test scores among the four groups. The analysis was repeated categorizing children on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) instead of diagnosis. RESULTS: The ability to use scores on the GMFM was slightly better than using BBS scores to distinguish among the groups when children were classified using diagnosis. Significant pair-wise differences among the groups were present on both the BBS and the GMFM when the children were grouped on the GMFCS. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the BBS can be considered as a clinical measure of balance for children with cerebral palsy, and a functional classification system can be used to group children more homogeneously than traditional classification by diagnosis.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the use of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) to assess the balance abilities of children with cerebral palsy. METHODS: Thirty-six ambulatory children with cerebral palsy and 14 children with no motor impairment (ages eight to 12 years) were assessed on the BBS and the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM). Participants with cerebral palsy comprised three groups based on diagnosis (spastic hemiplegia, spastic diplegia who ambulated without aids, and spastic diplegia who ambulated with aids). A fourth group consisted of control subjects with no motor impairment. It was hypothesized that these four groups demonstrated a hierarchy of balance abilities. A one-way ANOVA was used to detect significant differences in test scores among the four groups. The analysis was repeated categorizing children on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) instead of diagnosis. RESULTS: The ability to use scores on the GMFM was slightly better than using BBS scores to distinguish among the groups when children were classified using diagnosis. Significant pair-wise differences among the groups were present on both the BBS and the GMFM when the children were grouped on the GMFCS. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the BBS can be considered as a clinical measure of balance for children with cerebral palsy, and a functional classification system can be used to group children more homogeneously than traditional classification by diagnosis.
Authors: Luanda André Collange Grecco; Natália de Almeida Carvalho Duarte; Mariana Emerenciano de Mendonça; Hugo Pasini; Vânia Lúcia Costa de Carvalho Lima; Renata Calhes Franco; Luis Vicente Franco de Oliveira; Paulo de Tarso Camilo de Carvalho; João Carlos Ferrari Corrêa; Nelci Zanon Collange; Luciana Maria Malosá Sampaio; Manuela Galli; Felipe Fregni; Claudia Santos Oliveira Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Thaluanna C L Christovão; Hugo Pasini; Luanda A C Grecco; Luiz A B Ferreira; Natália A C Duarte; Cláudia S Oliveira Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Soráia Kazon; Luanda A C Grecco; Hugo Pasini; João C F Corrêa; Thaluanna C L Christovão; Paulo de Tarsocamillo de Carvalho; Lilian Chrystiane Giannasi; Paulo R G Lucareli; Luis Vicente Franco de Oliveira; Afonso Shiguemi Inoue Salgado; Luciana M M Sampaio; Claudia S Oliveira Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 2.125