PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Glomerular filtration rate is widely accepted as the best overall measure of kidney function. Currently available methods to estimate glomerular filtration rate have strengths and limitations. Cystatin C is a novel endogenous filtration marker being considered as a potential replacement for serum creatinine. This review summarizes the currently available glomerular filtration rate estimating equations based on cystatin C and the literature comparing cystatin C and creatinine as filtration markers. RECENT FINDINGS: In most cystatin C estimating equations, inclusion of age and sex did not substantially improve their performance. Equations yield different glomerular filtration rate estimates for the same level of cystatin C. Variation among equations may be due to differences among the assays or populations in the individual studies. Studies comparing cystatin C with creatinine or creatinine-based estimating equations show heterogeneous results, with some showing improved performance and others showing equivalent performance even in similar populations. These heterogeneous results may be due to inappropriate comparisons between equations developed in one population with those developed in another, or to the differences between assays or population characteristics. SUMMARY: Cystatin C shows promise as an alternative to serum creatinine but several important questions remain before it can be recommended for use in clinical practice.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Glomerular filtration rate is widely accepted as the best overall measure of kidney function. Currently available methods to estimate glomerular filtration rate have strengths and limitations. Cystatin C is a novel endogenous filtration marker being considered as a potential replacement for serum creatinine. This review summarizes the currently available glomerular filtration rate estimating equations based on cystatin C and the literature comparing cystatin C and creatinine as filtration markers. RECENT FINDINGS: In most cystatin C estimating equations, inclusion of age and sex did not substantially improve their performance. Equations yield different glomerular filtration rate estimates for the same level of cystatin C. Variation among equations may be due to differences among the assays or populations in the individual studies. Studies comparing cystatin C with creatinine or creatinine-based estimating equations show heterogeneous results, with some showing improved performance and others showing equivalent performance even in similar populations. These heterogeneous results may be due to inappropriate comparisons between equations developed in one population with those developed in another, or to the differences between assays or population characteristics. SUMMARY:Cystatin C shows promise as an alternative to serum creatinine but several important questions remain before it can be recommended for use in clinical practice.
Authors: Frank Dieterle; Elias Perentes; André Cordier; Daniel R Roth; Pablo Verdes; Olivier Grenet; Serafino Pantano; Pierre Moulin; Daniel Wahl; Andreas Mahl; Peter End; Frank Staedtler; François Legay; Kevin Carl; David Laurie; Salah-Dine Chibout; Jacky Vonderscher; Gérard Maurer Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Josef S Ozer; Frank Dieterle; Sean Troth; Elias Perentes; André Cordier; Pablo Verdes; Frank Staedtler; Andreas Mahl; Olivier Grenet; Daniel R Roth; Daniel Wahl; François Legay; Daniel Holder; Zoltan Erdos; Katerina Vlasakova; Hong Jin; Yan Yu; Nagaraja Muniappa; Tom Forest; Holly K Clouse; Spencer Reynolds; Wendy J Bailey; Douglas T Thudium; Michael J Topper; Thomas R Skopek; Joseph F Sina; Warren E Glaab; Jacky Vonderscher; Gérard Maurer; Salah-Dine Chibout; Frank D Sistare; David L Gerhold Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Darcy Groesbeck; Anna Köttgen; Rulan Parekh; Elizabeth Selvin; George J Schwartz; Josef Coresh; Susan Furth Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Amanda Mocroft; Christina Wyatt; Lynda Szczech; Jacquie Neuhaus; Wafaa El-Sadr; Russell Tracy; Lewis Kuller; Michael Shlipak; Brian Angus; Harting Klinker; Michael Ross Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Louise J Maple-Brown; Paul D Lawton; Jaquelyne T Hughes; Suresh K Sharma; Graham Rd Jones; Andrew G Ellis; Wendy Hoy; Alan Cass; Richard J Macisaac; Ashim K Sinha; Mark Ab Thomas; Leonard S Piers; Leigh C Ward; Katrina Drabsch; Sianna Panagiotopoulos; Robyn McDermott; Kevin Warr; Sajiv Cherian; Alex Brown; George Jerums; Kerin O'Dea Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Josef Coresh; Christopher H Schmid; Harold I Feldman; Marc Froissart; John Kusek; Jerome Rossert; Frederick Van Lente; Robert D Bruce; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Tom Greene; Andrew S Levey Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 8.860