Literature DB >> 17052777

Impact of neurohormonal blockade on association between body mass index and mortality.

Linn M A Kennedy1, Stefan D Anker, John Kjekshus, Tom J Cook, Ronnie Willenheimer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of body mass index (BMI) in patients following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may be altered by neurohormonal blockade.
METHODS: The impact of neurohormonal blockade on the association between BMI and mortality was examined in 5548 patients following AMI (CONSENSUS II), 50% receiving enalapril and 7% beta-blockade, and in 4367 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) (4S), 79% with prior AMI, 12% receiving ACEi and 67% beta-blockade. Median follow-up was 0.4 and 5.2 years, respectively. Patients were categorized into 4 BMI groups: Underweight, < 22.00; normal-weight, 22.00-24.99; overweight, 25.00-29.99; obese, > or = 30.00 kg/m2. Multivariable analysis adjusted for demographics, patient history, physical examination, biochemistry and medication.
RESULTS: CONSENSUS II: Overall, adjusted mortality (n=301) risk was similar across BMI groups. Comparing overweight with normal-weight patients, the hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality differed significantly (P=0.028) between patients randomized to placebo (HR 1.41) and enalapril (HR 0.75). 4S: Overall, adjusted mortality (n=421) risk was similar for normal-weight, overweight and obese patients. In a time-dependent analysis for drug use, comparing obese with normal-weight patients, the HRs for mortality differed significantly (P=0.047) between patients without (HR 1.86) and those with (HR 0.97) neurohormonal blockade.
CONCLUSION: In patients after AMI or with CAD, high BMI was associated with increased mortality risk among patients not receiving neurohormonal blockade, but with decreased or neutral mortality risk among those receiving neurohormonal blockade. Tests for interaction indicate that neurohormonal blockade may attenuate the relationship between high BMI and increased mortality risk. Neurohormonal blockade may thus partly explain the so-called obesity paradox.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17052777     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.06.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  2 in total

1.  Cachexia and aging: an update based on the Fourth International Cachexia Meeting.

Authors:  J E Morley; S D Anker; W J Evans
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Prolonged and intensive medication use are associated with the obesity paradox after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 studies.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Tan; Jia-Xin Shi; And Meng-Hua Chen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.298

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.