Literature DB >> 17052487

Prevalence and factors associated with use of placebo control groups in randomized controlled trials in psoriasis: a cross-sectional study.

Kenneth A Katz1, Jason H Karlawish, David S Chiang, Rachel A Bognet, Katherine J Propert, David J Margolis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ethics and science of using placebo control groups in clinical trials have been widely debated. Few studies, however, have examined factors associated with choice of control group.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the prevalence of use of placebo controls in randomized controlled trials in psoriasis and to identify factors associated with use of placebo controls in these trials.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of randomized controlled trials in psoriasis published from January 1, 2001 to December 20, 2005 and indexed in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We extracted data on types of control groups used, design issues (number of patients enrolled, primary end point), disease characteristics (psoriasis type and severity), and extrascientific issues (trial location, funding source, and year of publication). We used bivariable and multivariable logistic regression to determine factors associated with use of a placebo control group.
RESULTS: Of 194 citations, 187 were available for review. One hundred thirty-five trials from 134 articles in 38 journals met inclusion criteria. Eighty-three trials (61.5%) enrolling 8171 subjects (41.7%) used active controls only, and 52 trials (38.5%) enrolling 11,406 subjects (58.3%) used placebo controls. Adjusted for trial location and funding source, trials significantly more likely to have used placebo controls included those conducted in the United States (odds ratio [OR], 5.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.45-13.68; P < .001) and those funded by pharmaceutical companies (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.19-5.73; P = .02). Predicted frequencies of placebo use ranged from 77.6% (industry-funded, conducted trials in the United States) to 18.6% (non-industry-funded trials not conducted in the United States). LIMITATIONS: Our searches may not have identified all published trials, and we did not have access to data from unpublished trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of placebo controls has been more common in psoriasis trials conducted in the United States and funded by pharmaceutical companies. The findings suggest that ethical and scientific issues related to choice of control group in psoriasis trials are interpreted markedly differently depending on trial location and funding source.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17052487     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  6 in total

1.  The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences. Part 1: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on the findings, protocols, and quality of drug trials.

Authors:  Gisela Schott; Henry Pachl; Ulrich Limbach; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Klaus Lieb
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences: part 2: a qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on authorship, access to trial data, and trial registration and publication.

Authors:  Gisela Schott; Henry Pachl; Ulrich Limbach; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Klaus Lieb; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Lundh; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Jeppe B Schroll; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Lundh; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Jeppe B Schroll; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-16

5.  Randomized controlled trials vs. observational studies: why not just live together?

Authors:  David Faraoni; Simon Thomas Schaefer
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness research in cancer therapy: a systematic review of literature trends, methods and the influence of funding.

Authors:  Daoud Al-Badriyeh; Marwah Alameri; Randa Al-Okka
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.