Akihiko Kadokawa1, Shiro Suzuki, Takuo Tanaka. 1. Fixed Prosthetic Dentistry, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Japan. prosth@dentb.hal.kagoshima-u.ac.jp
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: When porcelain surfaces oppose gold and composite resin restorations as well as enamel, wear resistance and abrasiveness of the porcelain are clinical concerns to maintain the occlusal relationship. However, there is limited information on comparison of mutual wear rates when these materials oppose in 2-body and 3-body conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mutual wear rates of dental porcelain and opposing materials, including a gold alloy, a composite resin, and human enamel, using an in vitro wear test. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Mutual wear between high-fusing dental porcelain (Ceramco II) disks (9 x 5-mm thick) with a rough or smooth surface and opposing styli made of gold alloy, composite resin, or human enamel was evaluated in 2-body and 3-body conditions using a wear simulator (n=8). Wear depths (microm) of porcelain disks were determined using a profilometer. Wear depths (microm) of the opposing materials were obtained by converting the worn surface areas into wear depths using image-analysis software. All data were statistically analyzed by 3-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-Dunn test (alpha=.05). The worn surfaces were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: The wear values for porcelain opposing composite resin or enamel in the 2-body condition were significantly greater than those in the 3-body condition, regardless of the surface condition of the porcelain (P<.001). For stylus specimens, all values in the 2-body condition were significantly greater than those in the 3-body condition, regardless of the surface condition of the opposing porcelain (P<.001). These results are supported by SEM observations of worn surfaces. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that mutual wear rates, when porcelain opposes gold, composite resin, and enamel, are influenced by 2-body and 3-body wear conditions.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: When porcelain surfaces oppose gold and composite resin restorations as well as enamel, wear resistance and abrasiveness of the porcelain are clinical concerns to maintain the occlusal relationship. However, there is limited information on comparison of mutual wear rates when these materials oppose in 2-body and 3-body conditions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mutual wear rates of dental porcelain and opposing materials, including a gold alloy, a composite resin, and human enamel, using an in vitro wear test. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Mutual wear between high-fusing dental porcelain (Ceramco II) disks (9 x 5-mm thick) with a rough or smooth surface and opposing styli made of gold alloy, composite resin, or human enamel was evaluated in 2-body and 3-body conditions using a wear simulator (n=8). Wear depths (microm) of porcelain disks were determined using a profilometer. Wear depths (microm) of the opposing materials were obtained by converting the worn surface areas into wear depths using image-analysis software. All data were statistically analyzed by 3-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni-Dunn test (alpha=.05). The worn surfaces were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: The wear values for porcelain opposing composite resin or enamel in the 2-body condition were significantly greater than those in the 3-body condition, regardless of the surface condition of the porcelain (P<.001). For stylus specimens, all values in the 2-body condition were significantly greater than those in the 3-body condition, regardless of the surface condition of the opposing porcelain (P<.001). These results are supported by SEM observations of worn surfaces. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that mutual wear rates, when porcelain opposes gold, composite resin, and enamel, are influenced by 2-body and 3-body wear conditions.
Authors: Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw; William F Rose; Allyson A Barrett; Erica R Oliveira; Mark C K Yang; Arthur E Clark; Kenneth J Anusavice Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2012-03-10 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Ghadeer S AlSuwaidi; Ruwaida Z Alshali; Nesreen A Salim; Julian D Satterthwaite; Nick Silikas Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-09-10 Impact factor: 3.246
Authors: Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw; Shu-Min Hsu; Ana C Bohórquez; Nader Abdulhameed; Gary W Scheiffele; Mijin Kim; Dan Neal; John Chai; Fan Ren Journal: Clin Exp Dent Res Date: 2020-09-21