Literature DB >> 17052150

On the use of analytical expressions for the voltage distribution to analyze intracellular recordings.

Michelle Rudolph1, Alain Destexhe.   

Abstract

Different analytical expressions for the membrane potential distribution of membranes subject to synaptic noise have been proposed and can be very helpful in analyzing experimental data. However, all of these expressions are either approximations or limit cases, and it is not clear how they compare and which expression should be used in a given situation. In this note, we provide a comparison of the different approximations available, with an aim of delineating which expression is most suitable for analyzing experimental data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17052150     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.12.2917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  4 in total

1.  Estimating three synaptic conductances in a stochastic neural model.

Authors:  Stephen E Odom; Alla Borisyuk
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Sensitivity of firing rate to input fluctuations depends on time scale separation between fast and slow variables in single neurons.

Authors:  Brian Nils Lundstrom; Michael Famulare; Larry B Sorensen; William J Spain; Adrienne L Fairhall
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Inhibitory "noise".

Authors:  Alain Destexhe
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.505

4.  The Effect of Common Signals on Power, Coherence and Granger Causality: Theoretical Review, Simulations, and Empirical Analysis of Fruit Fly LFPs Data.

Authors:  Dror Cohen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.