Literature DB >> 17051298

Decision support, knowledge representation and management in medicine.

M Peleg1, S Tu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Clinical decision-support systems (CDSSs) are being recognized as important tools for improving quality of care. In this paper, we review the literature to find trends in CDSSs that were developed over the last few decades and give some indication of future directions in developing successful, usable clinical decision-support systems.
METHODS: We searched PubMed for papers that were published during the past five years with the words Decision Support Systems appearing in the title and used our own knowledge of the field for earlier work.
RESULTS: The goals of developers of modern CDSSs are to develop systems that deliver needed information and could be integrated with the healthcare's organizational dynamics. Such CDSSs form part of knowledge-management activities that healthcare organizations employ in order to excel. During the past few decades, we have witnessed a gradual maturation of knowledge representation formalisms and the needed infrastructure for developing integrated CDSSs, including electronic health record systems (EHR), standard terminologies, and messaging standards for exchange of clinical data. The demand for CDSSs that are effective and that will evolve as circumstances change gave rise to methodologies that guide developers on the construction and evaluation of CDSSs.
CONCLUSION: Although there exist many approaches for representing, managing and delivering clinical knowledge, the design and implementation of good and useful systems that will last and evolve are still active areas of research. The gradual maturation of EHR and infrastructure standards should make it possible for CDSSs implementers to make major contributions to the delivery of healthcare.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17051298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yearb Med Inform        ISSN: 0943-4747


  14 in total

Review 1.  Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review.

Authors:  Frances S Mair; Carl May; Catherine O'Donnell; Tracy Finch; Frank Sullivan; Elizabeth Murray
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Personalization and Patient Involvement in Decision Support Systems: Current Trends.

Authors:  S Quaglini; L Sacchi; G Lanzola; N Viani
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2015-08-13

3.  Breast cancer therapy planning - a novel support concept for a sequential decision making problem.

Authors:  Alexander Scherrer; Ilka Schwidde; Andreas Dinges; Patrick Rüdiger; Sherko Kümmel; Karl-Heinz Küfer
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 4.  Clinical Decision Support: a 25 Year Retrospective and a 25 Year Vision.

Authors:  B Middleton; D F Sittig; A Wright
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-08-02

5.  Evaluation of a clinical tool for early etiology identification in status epilepticus.

Authors:  Jong Woo Lee; Andrea O Rossetti; Vincent Alvarez; M Brandon Westover; Frank W Drislane; Barbara A Dworetzky; David Curley
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 5.864

6.  An Ontology for Telemedicine Systems Resiliency to Technological Context Variations in Pervasive Healthcare.

Authors:  Nekane Larburu; Richard G A Bults; Marten J Van Sinderen; Ing Widya; Hermie J Hermens
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.316

Review 7.  Advances in Clinical Decision Support: Highlights of Practice and the Literature 2015-2016.

Authors:  R A Jenders
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 8.  Recommendations service for chronic disease patient in multimodel sensors home environment.

Authors:  Maqbool Hussain; Taqdir Ali; Wajahat Ali Khan; Muhammad Afzal; Sungyoung Lee; Khalid Latif
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.536

9.  Investigating the Heart Pump Implant Decision Process: Opportunities for Decision Support Tools to Help.

Authors:  Qian Yang; John Zimmerman; Aaron Steinfeld; Lisa Carey; James F Antaki
Journal:  ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.351

10.  Is research working for you? Validating a tool to examine the capacity of health organizations to use research.

Authors:  Anita Kothari; Nancy Edwards; Nadia Hamel; Maria Judd
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.