Literature DB >> 17051275

Constructing multiple choice questions as a method for learning.

Edward Palmer1, Peter Devitt.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many different strategies exist to try and encourage students to increase their knowledge and understanding of a subject. This study was undertaken to measure the effect of student-based construction of multiple choice questions (MCQs) as a stimulus for the learning and understanding of topics in clinical surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out at the University of Adelaide, Australia and had 2 components. Fourth-year students were required to provide a case study during a surgical attachment and half of the group was asked to supplement this with MCQs. These students were pre- and post-tested and the effect of the additional intervention (MCQ-construction) measured. Fifth-year students were polled on their preferred methods of learning before and after a learning exercise in which they were asked to undertake a case presentation and create some MCQs.
RESULTS: The MCQ questions designed by the students were of a high standard and clearly displayed an understanding of the topic concerned. The 4th-year students in the MCQ construction group showed equivalent outcomes as the case study control group. Students initially ranked MCQ-construction amongst the least stimulating methods of learning, but after the exercise their opinion was significantly more favourable, although still much less than traditional learning methodologies (tutorials, books).
CONCLUSIONS: Construction of MCQs as a learning tool is an unfamiliar exercise to most students and is an unpopular learning strategy. However, students are capable of producing high quality questions, and the challenge for medical faculties is how best to use this initiative to the students' advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17051275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  9 in total

1.  Question-writing as a learning tool for students--outcomes from curricular exams.

Authors:  Alexander Jobs; Christoph Twesten; Anna Göbel; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Hendrik Lehnert; Gunther Weitz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Development of a competency-based formative progress test with student-generated MCQs: Results from a multi-centre pilot study.

Authors:  Stefan Wagener; Andreas Möltner; Sevgi Tımbıl; Maryna Gornostayeva; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Peter Brüstle; Daniela Mohr; Anna Vander Beken; Julian Better; Martin Fries; Marc Gottschalk; Janine Günther; Laura Herrmann; Christian Kreisel; Tobias Moczko; Claudius Illg; Adam Jassowicz; Andreas Müller; Moritz Niesert; Felix Strübing; Jana Jünger
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  Does developing multiple-choice Questions Improve Medical Students' Learning? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Youness Touissi; Ghita Hjiej; Abderrazak Hajjioui; Azeddine Ibrahimi; Maryam Fourtassi
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2022-12

4.  Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.

Authors:  Edward J Palmer; Peter G Devitt
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  The effect of question generation activity on students' learning and perception.

Authors:  Abdolhussein Shakurnia; Maryam Aslami; Mahdi Bijanzadeh
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2018-04

6.  Promoting student case creation to enhance instruction of clinical reasoning skills: a pilot feasibility study.

Authors:  Hamsika Chandrasekar; Neil Gesundheit; Andrew B Nevins; Peter Pompei; Janine Bruce; Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2018-04-12

7.  Randomized study showing the benefit of medical study writing multiple choice questions on their learning.

Authors:  Jose Ignacio Herrero; Felipe Lucena; Jorge Quiroga
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Use of Student-Generated Multiple Choice Questions to Enhance Team-Based Learning of Anatomy at the University of Rwanda.

Authors:  Isaie Sibomana; Irenee David Karenzi; Irenee Niyongombwa; Jean Claude Byiringiro; Julien Gashegu; Faustin Ntirenganya
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2020-11-03

9.  Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.

Authors:  Clare Guilding; Rachel Emma Pye; Stephanie Butler; Michael Atkinson; Eimear Field
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2021-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.