Literature DB >> 17050835

Aquatic turning performance of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and functional consequences of a rigid body design.

Gabriel Rivera1, Angela R V Rivera, Erin E Dougherty, Richard W Blob.   

Abstract

The ability to capture prey and avoid predation in aquatic habitats depends strongly on the ability to perform unsteady maneuvers (e.g. turns), which itself depends strongly on body flexibility. Two previous studies of turning performance in rigid-bodied taxa have found either high maneuverability or high agility, but not both. However, examinations of aquatic turning performance in rigid-bodied animals have had limited taxonomic scope and, as such, the effects of many body shapes and designs on aquatic maneuverability and agility have yet to be examined. Turtles represent the oldest extant lineage of rigid-bodied vertebrates and the only aquatic rigid-bodied tetrapods. We evaluated the aquatic turning performance of painted turtles, Chrysemys picta (Schneider, 1783) using the minimum length-specific radius of the turning path (R/L) and the average turning rate (omega(avg)) as measures of maneuverability and agility, respectively. We filmed turtles conducting forward and backward turns in an aquatic arena. Each type of turn was executed using a different pattern of limb movements. During forward turns, turtles consistently protracted the inboard forelimb and held it stationary into the flow, while continuing to move the outboard forelimb and both hindlimbs as in rectilinear swimming. The limb movements of backward turns were more complex than those of forward turns, but involved near simultaneous retraction and protraction of contralateral fore- and hindlimbs, respectively. Forward turns had a minimum R/L of 0.0018 (the second single lowest value reported from any animal) and a maximum omega(avg) of 247.1 degrees. Values of R/L for backward turns (0.0091-0.0950 L) were much less variable than that of forward turns (0.0018-1.0442 L). The maneuverability of turtles is similar to that recorded previously for rigid-bodied boxfish. However, several morphological features of turtles (e.g. shell morphology and limb position) appear to increase agility relative to the body design of boxfish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050835     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Sensory-evoked turning locomotion in red-eared turtles: kinematic analysis and electromyography.

Authors:  Dan B Welch; Scott N Currie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  "On the Fence" versus "All in": Insights from Turtles for the Evolution of Aquatic Locomotor Specializations and Habitat Transitions in Tetrapod Vertebrates.

Authors:  Richard W Blob; Christopher J Mayerl; Angela R V Rivera; Gabriel Rivera; Vanessa K H Young
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 3.  Central pattern generators in the turtle spinal cord: selection among the forms of motor behaviors.

Authors:  Paul S G Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Forelimb kinematics and motor patterns of the slider turtle (Trachemys scripta) during swimming and walking: shared and novel strategies for meeting locomotor demands of water and land.

Authors:  Angela R V Rivera; Richard W Blob
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Hydrodynamic stability of the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta): effects of four-limbed rowing versus forelimb flapping in rigid-bodied tetrapods.

Authors:  Gabriel Rivera; Angela R V Rivera; Richard W Blob
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Forelimb kinematics during swimming in the pig-nosed turtle, Carettochelys insculpta, compared with other turtle taxa: rowing versus flapping, convergence versus intermediacy.

Authors:  Angela R V Rivera; Gabriel Rivera; Richard W Blob
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Swimming Turned on Its Head: Stability and Maneuverability of the Shrimpfish (Aeoliscus punctulatus).

Authors:  F E Fish; R Holzman
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2019-10-10

8.  Body and Pectoral Fin Kinematics During Routine Yaw Turning in Bonnethead Sharks (Sphyrna tiburo).

Authors:  S L Hoffmann; M E Porter
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2019-06-22

9.  Body side-specific control of motor activity during turning in a walking animal.

Authors:  Matthias Gruhn; Philipp Rosenbaum; Till Bockemühl; Ansgar Büschges
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.