Literature DB >> 17050750

Linking resident satisfaction to staff perceptions of the work environment in assisted living: A multilevel analysis.

Elzbieta Sikorska-Simmons1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines the relationship between resident satisfaction and staff perceptions of the work environment in assisted living. Staff perceptions were assessed at the facility level, using aggregate measures of staff job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and views of organizational culture. DESIGN AND METHODS: The sample included 335 residents and 298 staff members in 43 assisted living facilities. Data were collected by means of self-administered questionnaires. Two-level hierarchical linear models were used to test the hypotheses. With resident age, gender, and education controlled for, the relationships between resident satisfaction (Level 1 variable) and staff perceptions of the work environment (Level 2 variables) were assessed.
RESULTS: Greater resident satisfaction in the facility was associated with higher staff job satisfaction and more positive staff views of organizational culture (e.g., greater teamwork and participation in the decision making). From resident characteristics, only education was significantly related to satisfaction. More educated residents were less satisfied with assisted living. IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that a good quality of work environment for the staff contributes to a better quality of care for the residents. More research is needed to examine the causal nature of this relationship.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050750     DOI: 10.1093/geront/46.5.590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontologist        ISSN: 0016-9013


  9 in total

1.  A configurational approach to the relationship between high-performance work practices and frontline health care worker outcomes.

Authors:  Emmeline Chuang; Janette Dill; Jennifer Craft Morgan; Thomas R Konrad
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Honoring the Everyday Preferences of Nursing Home Residents: Perceived Choice and Satisfaction With Care.

Authors:  Lauren R Bangerter; Allison R Heid; Katherine Abbott; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  Advantage and choice: social relationships and staff assistance in assisted living.

Authors:  Stephanie Burge; Debra Street
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Health-related quality of life: expanding a conceptual framework to include older adults who receive long-term services and supports.

Authors:  Cynthia Zubritsky; Katherine M Abbott; Karen B Hirschman; Kathryn H Bowles; Janice B Foust; Mary D Naylor
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2012-08-02

5.  Pathways to Assisted Living: The Influence of Race and Class.

Authors:  Mary M Ball; Molly M Perkins; Carole Hollingsworth; Frank J Whittington; Sharon V King
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2009-02-01

6.  Differences in assisted living staff perceptions, experiences, and attitudes.

Authors:  Anna S Beeber; Lauren W Cohen; Sheryl Zimmerman; Lisa P Gwyther; Tiffany Washington; John G Cagle; David Reed
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 1.254

7.  How do stakeholders from multiple hierarchical levels of a large provincial health system define engagement? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Jill M Norris; Deborah E White; Lorelli Nowell; Kelly Mrklas; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Development and psychometric testing of the clinical networks engagement tool.

Authors:  Jill M Norris; Kent G Hecker; Leora Rabatach; Tom W Noseworthy; Deborah E White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Coincidence analysis: a new method for causal inference in implementation science.

Authors:  Rebecca Garr Whitaker; Nina Sperber; Michael Baumgartner; Alrik Thiem; Deborah Cragun; Laura Damschroder; Edward J Miech; Alecia Slade; Sarah Birken
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 7.327

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.