Literature DB >> 17050712

Methodological considerations on the use of template matching to study long-lasting memory trace replay.

Masami Tatsuno1, Peter Lipa, Bruce L McNaughton.   

Abstract

Replay of behaviorally induced neural activity patterns during subsequent sleep has been suggested to play an important role in memory consolidation. Many previous studies, mostly involving familiar experiences, suggest that such reactivation occurs, but decays quickly (approximately 1 h). Recently, however, long-lasting (up to approximately 48 h) "reverberation" of neural activity patterns induced by a novel experience was reported on the basis of a template-matching analysis. Because detection and quantification of memory-trace replay depends critically on analysis methods, we investigated the statistical properties of the template-matching method and analyzed rodent neural ensemble activity patterns after a novel experience. For comparison, we also analyzed the same data with an independent analysis technique, the explained variance method. Contrary to the recent report, we did not observe significant long-lasting reverberation using either the template matching or the explained variance approaches. The latter, however, did reveal short-lasting reactivation in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. In addition, detailed analysis of the template-matching method shows that, in the present study, coarse mean firing rate differences among neurons, but not fine temporal spike structures, dominate the results of template matching. Most importantly, it is also demonstrated that partial comparisons of template-matching correlations, such as used in the recent paper, may lead to erroneous conclusions. These investigations indicate that the outcome of template-matching analysis is very sensitive to the conditions of how it is applied, and should be interpreted cautiously, and that the existence of long-lasting reverberation after a novel experience requires additional verification.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050712      PMCID: PMC6674739          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3317-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

Review 1.  Finding the engram.

Authors:  Sheena A Josselyn; Stefan Köhler; Paul W Frankland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  New experiences enhance coordinated neural activity in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Sen Cheng; Loren M Frank
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Memory processes during sleep: beyond the standard consolidation theory.

Authors:  Nikolai Axmacher; Andreas Draguhn; Christian E Elger; Juergen Fell
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Selection of preconfigured cell assemblies for representation of novel spatial experiences.

Authors:  George Dragoi; Susumu Tonegawa
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Preferential reactivation of motivationally relevant information in the ventral striatum.

Authors:  Carien S Lansink; Pieter M Goltstein; Jan V Lankelma; Ruud N J M A Joosten; Bruce L McNaughton; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations.

Authors:  György Buzsáki; Kenji Mizuseki
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Memory reactivation in rat medial prefrontal cortex occurs in a subtype of cortical UP state during slow-wave sleep.

Authors:  Masami Tatsuno; Soroush Malek; LeAnna Kalvi; Adrian Ponce-Alvarez; Karim Ali; David R Euston; Sonja Gruen; Bruce L McNaughton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  About sleep's role in memory.

Authors:  Björn Rasch; Jan Born
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Sequence reactivation in the hippocampus is impaired in aged rats.

Authors:  Jason L Gerrard; Sara N Burke; Bruce L McNaughton; Carol A Barnes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Hippocampus leads ventral striatum in replay of place-reward information.

Authors:  Carien S Lansink; Pieter M Goltstein; Jan V Lankelma; Bruce L McNaughton; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.