Literature DB >> 17050469

Development of the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test to assess key markers of specific language and literacy difficulties in young children.

Hilary Gardner1, Karen Froud, Alastair McClelland, Heather K J van der Lely.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a large body of evidence regarding reliable indicators of language deficits in young children, there has not been a standardized, quick screen for language impairment. The Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test was therefore designed as a short, reliable assessment of young children's language abilities. AIMS: GAPS was designed to provide a quick screening test to assess whether pre- and early school entry children have the necessary grammar and pre-reading phonological skills needed for education and social development. This paper reports the theoretical background to the test, the pilot study and reliability, and the standardization.
METHODS: This 10-min test comprises 11 test sentences and eight test nonsense words for direct imitation and is designed to highlight significant markers of language impairment and reading difficulties. To standardize the GAPS, 668 children aged 3.4-6.6 were tested across the UK, taking into account population distribution and socio-economic status. The test was carried out by a range of health and education professionals as well as by students and carers using only simple, written instructions.
RESULTS: GAPS is effective in detecting a range of children in need of further in-depth assessment or monitoring for language difficulties. The results concur with those from much larger epidemiological studies using lengthy testing procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: The GAPS test (1) provides a successful screening tool; (2) is designed to be administered by professionals and non-professionals alike; and (3) facilitates identification of language impairment or at-risk factors of reading impairment in the early educational years. Thus, the test affords a first step in a process of assessment and targeted intervention to enable children to reach their potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17050469     DOI: 10.1080/13682820500442644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord        ISSN: 1368-2822            Impact factor:   3.020


  9 in total

1.  High acceptance of an early dyslexia screening test involving genetic analyses in Germany.

Authors:  Arndt Wilcke; Bent Müller; Gesa Schaadt; Holger Kirsten; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Screening for Language Difficulties in Disadvantaged Populations on Entry to Early Years Education: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Julie E Dockrell; Claire L Forrest; James Law; Sandra Mathers; Jenna Charlton
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  Phonological deficits in specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia: towards a multidimensional model.

Authors:  Franck Ramus; Chloe R Marshall; Stuart Rosen; Heather K J van der Lely
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  An investigation to validate the grammar and phonology screening (GAPS) test to identify children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Heather K J van der Lely; Elisabeth Payne; Alastair McClelland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sentence Repetition as a Tool for Screening Morphosyntactic Abilities of Bilectal Children with SLI.

Authors:  Elena Theodorou; Maria Kambanaros; Kleanthes K Grohmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-06

Review 6.  Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the Diagnosis, and Diagnostic Tools. A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alessandra Sansavini; Maria Elena Favilla; Maria Teresa Guasti; Andrea Marini; Stefania Millepiedi; Maria Valeria Di Martino; Simona Vecchi; Nadia Battajon; Laura Bertolo; Olga Capirci; Barbara Carretti; Maria Paola Colatei; Cristina Frioni; Luigi Marotta; Sara Massa; Letizia Michelazzo; Chiara Pecini; Silvia Piazzalunga; Manuela Pieretti; Pasquale Rinaldi; Renata Salvadorini; Cristiano Termine; Mariagrazia Zuccarini; Simonetta D'Amico; Anna Giulia De Cagno; Maria Chiara Levorato; Tiziana Rossetto; Maria Luisa Lorusso
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-17

7.  Parental phonological memory contributes to prediction of outcome of late talkers from 20 months to 4 years: a longitudinal study of precursors of specific language impairment.

Authors:  Dorothy Vm Bishop; Georgina Holt; Elizabeth Line; David McDonald; Sarah McDonald; Helen Watt
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  No population bias to left-hemisphere language in 4-year-olds with language impairment.

Authors:  Dorothy V M Bishop; Georgina Holt; Andrew J O Whitehouse; Margriet Groen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Independent and Combined Effects of Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Bilingualism on Children's Vocabulary and Verbal Short-Term Memory.

Authors:  Natalia Meir; Sharon Armon-Lotem
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.