Literature DB >> 17049408

The effect of low-complexity patients on emergency department waiting times.

Michael J Schull1, Alex Kiss, John-Paul Szalai.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The extent to which patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with minor conditions contribute to delays and crowding is controversial. To test this question, we study the effect of low-complexity ED patients on the waiting times of other patients.
METHODS: We obtained administrative records on all ED visits to Ontario hospitals from April 2002 to March 2003. For each ED, we determined the association between the number of new low-complexity patients (defined as ambulatory arrival, low-acuity triage level, and discharged) presenting in each 8-hour interval and the mean ED length of stay and time to first physician contact for medium- and high-complexity patients. Covariates were the number of new high- and medium-complexity patients, mean patient age, sex distribution, hospital teaching status, work shift, weekday/weekend, and total patient-hours. Autoregression modeling was used given correlation in the data.
RESULTS: One thousand ninety-five consecutive 8-hour intervals at 110 EDs were analyzed; 4.1 million patient visits occurred, 50.8% of patients were women, and mean age was 38.4 years. Low-, medium-, and high-complexity patients represented 50.9%, 37.1%, and 12% of all patients, respectively. Mean (median) ED length of stay was 6.3 (4.7), 3.9 (2.8), and 2.2 (1.6) hours for high-, medium-, and low-complexity patients, respectively, and mean (median) time to first physician contact was 1.1 (0.7), 1.3 (0.9), and 1.1 (0.8) hours. In adjusted analyses, every 10 low-complexity patients arriving per 8 hours was associated with a 5.4-minute (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2 to 6.0 minutes) increase in mean length of stay and a 2.1-minute (95% CI 1.8 to 2.4 minutes) increase in mean time to first physician contact for medium- and high-complexity patients. Results were similar regardless of ED volume and teaching status.
CONCLUSION: Low-complexity ED patients are associated with a negligible increase in ED length of stay and time to first physician contact for other ED patients. Reducing the number of low-complexity ED patients is unlikely to reduce waiting times for other patients or lessen crowding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17049408     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  44 in total

1.  Bottlenecks in the emergency department: the psychiatric clinicians' perspective.

Authors:  Grace Chang; Anthony P Weiss; E John Orav; Jennifer A Smallwood; Stephanie Gonzalez; Joshua M Kosowsky; Scott L Rauch
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.238

2.  Expanding after-hours access to primary care unlikely to decrease burden on EDs.

Authors:  Leila Salehi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Wait times in the emergency department for patients with mental illness.

Authors:  Clare L Atzema; Michael J Schull; Paul Kurdyak; Natasja M Menezes; Andrew S Wilton; Marian J Vermuelen; Peter C Austin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Epidemiology of otologic diagnoses in United States emergency departments.

Authors:  Elliott D Kozin; Rosh K V Sethi; Aaron K Remenschneider; Alyson B Kaplan; Daniel A Del Portal; Stacey T Gray; Mark G Shrime; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics.

Authors:  Robin M Weinick; Rachel M Burns; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Percentage of US emergency department patients seen within the recommended triage time: 1997 to 2006.

Authors:  Leora I Horwitz; Elizabeth H Bradley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-09

7.  Emergency department crowding: factors influencing flow.

Authors:  Alp Arkun; William M Briggs; Sweha Patel; Paris A Datillo; Joseph Bove; Robert H Birkhahn
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-02

Review 8.  Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions.

Authors:  Nathan R Hoot; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Socioeconomic composition of low-acuity emergency department users in Ontario.

Authors:  Nancy A Vanstone; Paul Belanger; Kieran Moore; Jaelyn M Caudle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Low-acuity presentations to the emergency department: Reasons for and access to other health care providers before presentation.

Authors:  Kimberley Sancton; Leila Sloss; Jonathan Berkowitz; Nardia Strydom; Rita McCracken
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.