Literature DB >> 17049333

Preferred viewing distance and screen angle of electronic paper displays.

Kong-King Shieh1, Der-Song Lee.   

Abstract

This study explored the viewing distance and screen angle for electronic paper (E-Paper) displays under various light sources, ambient illuminations, and character sizes. Data analysis showed that the mean viewing distance and screen angle were 495 mm and 123.7 degrees. The mean viewing distances for Kolin Chlorestic Liquid Crystal display was 500 mm, significantly longer than Sony electronic ink display, 491 mm. Screen angle for Kolin was 127.4 degrees, significantly greater than that of Sony, 120.0 degrees. Various light sources revealed no significant effect on viewing distances; nevertheless, they showed significant effect on screen angles. The screen angle for sunlight lamp (D65) was similar to that of fluorescent lamp (TL84), but greater than that of tungsten lamp (F). Ambient illumination and E-paper type had significant effects on viewing distance and screen angle. The higher the ambient illumination was, the longer the viewing distance and the lesser the screen angle. Character size had significant effect on viewing distances: the larger the character size, the longer the viewing distance. The results of this study indicated that the viewing distance for E-Paper was similar to that of visual display terminal (VDT) at around 500 mm, but greater than normal paper at about 360 mm. The mean screen angle was around 123.7 degrees, which in terms of viewing angle is 29.5 degrees below horizontal eye level. This result is similar to the general suggested viewing angle between 20 degrees and 50 degrees below the horizontal line of sight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17049333     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  7 in total

1.  Measuring sensitivity to viewpoint change with and without stereoscopic cues.

Authors:  Jason Bell; Edwin Dickinson; David R Badcock; Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Charles A Bigelow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Gaze and viewing angle influence visual stabilization of upright posture.

Authors:  Ki Ustinova; J Perkins
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Bilateral Implantation of a New Refractive Multi-Segmented Multifocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract or Refractive Lens Exchange Patients.

Authors:  Mike P Holzer; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Soraya M R Jonker; Erik L J G Mertens; Asim Bozkurt Sener; Jorge A O Cazal; Antoni Salvador Playa; Ramon Ruiz Mesa; Bettina C Thomas
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-21

5.  A Study on the Design of Vision Protection Products Based on Children's Visual Fatigue under Online Learning Scenarios.

Authors:  Di Feng; Chunfu Lu; Qingli Cai; Jun Lu
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25

6.  Does use of a virtual environment change reaching while standing in patients with traumatic brain injury?

Authors:  Amanda Y Schafer; Ksenia I Ustinova
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 7.  Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration.

Authors:  Amy L Sheppard; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.