Literature DB >> 17048739

Spatial frameworks in imagined navigation.

Marios N Avraamides1, Sofronis G Sofroniou.   

Abstract

The spatial framework model proposes that people use the extensions of their body axes as a reference frame for encoding spatial layouts in memory, and that the physical and functional properties of our bodies and the world determine the accessibility of egocentric locations from memory representations. The present experiment provides evidence that spatial framework results can be obtained even with perceptual scenes that contain no objects to be held in memory. Using a paradigm in which participants interpreted direction and distance information to follow a mental path within a checkerboard grid, the present study shows that spatial framework results are obtained when reasoning occurs from a perspective that is misaligned with respect to the physical reference frame of the participant. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17048739     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Spatial updating of environments described in texts.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Egocentric organization of spatial activities in imagined navigation.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Richard A Carlson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

3.  Frames of reference in spatial memories acquired from language.

Authors:  Weimin Mou; Kan Zhang; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: transformation versus interference accounts.

Authors:  Mark May
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Switching points of view in spatial mental models.

Authors:  N Franklin; B Tversky; V Coon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-09

6.  Use of cognitive versus perceptual heading during imagined locomotion depends on the response mode.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Roberta L Klatzky; Jack M Loomis; Reginald G Golledge
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-06

7.  Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation.

Authors:  J J Rieser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps.

Authors:  R N Shepard; S Hurwitz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

9.  Orientation in cognitive maps.

Authors:  D L Hintzman; C S O'Dell; D R Arndt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  What's so difficult with adopting imagined perspectives?

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Adamantini Hatzipanayioti; Alexia Galati
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

2.  Consciousness as recursive, spatiotemporal self-location.

Authors:  Frederic Peters
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-10

3.  How directions of route descriptions influence orientation specificity: the contribution of spatial abilities.

Authors:  Chiara Meneghetti; Veronica Muffato; Diego Varotto; Rossana De Beni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-22

4.  Egocentric updating of remote locations.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Alexia Galati; Christothea Papadopoulou
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.