Literature DB >> 17048386

Constructing splits graphs.

Andreas W M Dress1, Daniel H Huson.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic trees correspond one-to-one to compatible systems of splits and so splits play an important role in theoretical and computational aspects of phylogeny. Whereas any tree reconstruction method can be thought of as producing a compatible system of splits, an increasing number of phylogenetic algorithms are available that compute split systems that are not necessarily compatible and, thus, cannot always be represented by a tree. Such methods include the split decomposition, Neighbor-Net, consensus networks, and the Z-closure method. A more general split system of this kind can be represented graphically by a so-called splits graph, which generalizes the concept of a phylogenetic tree. This paper addresses the problem of computing a splits graph for a given set of splits. We have implemented all presented algorithms in a new program called SplitsTree4.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 17048386     DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2004.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform        ISSN: 1545-5963            Impact factor:   3.710


  26 in total

1.  Consistency of the neighbor-net algorithm.

Authors:  David Bryant; Vincent Moulton; Andreas Spillner
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 1.405

2.  An intuitive, informative, and most balanced representation of phylogenetic topologies.

Authors:  Wataru Iwasaki; Toshihisa Takagi
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Duplication and concerted evolution in a master sex determiner under balancing selection.

Authors:  Eyal Privman; Yannick Wurm; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Whole-genome sequencing of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Manila sublineage results in less clustering and better resolution than mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing and spoligotyping.

Authors:  F B Jamieson; S Teatero; J L Guthrie; A Neemuchwala; N Fittipaldi; C Mehaffy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Metschnikowia Species Share a Pool of Diverse rRNA Genes Differing in Regions That Determine Hairpin-Loop Structures and Evolve by Reticulation.

Authors:  Matthias Sipiczki; Walter P Pfliegler; Imre J Holb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  MC-Net: a method for the construction of phylogenetic networks based on the Monte-Carlo method.

Authors:  Changiz Eslahchi; Mahnaz Habibi; Reza Hassanzadeh; Ehsan Mottaghi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Phylogenetic applications of the minimum contradiction approach on continuous characters.

Authors:  Marc Thuillard; Didier Fraix-Burnet
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 1.625

8.  NANUQ: a method for inferring species networks from gene trees under the coalescent model.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Allman; Hector Baños; John A Rhodes
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 1.405

9.  Genome maintenance functions of a putative Trypanosoma brucei translesion DNA polymerase include telomere association and a role in antigenic variation.

Authors:  Andrea Zurita Leal; Marie Schwebs; Emma Briggs; Nadine Weisert; Helena Reis; Leandro Lemgruber; Katarina Luko; Jonathan Wilkes; Falk Butter; Richard McCulloch; Christian J Janzen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A Genomic redefinition of Pseudomonas avellanae species.

Authors:  Marco Scortichini; Simone Marcelletti; Patrizia Ferrante; Giuseppe Firrao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.