Literature DB >> 17047655

Association of decreased mitochondrial DNA content with ovarian cancer progression.

Y Wang1, V W S Liu, W C Xue, A N Y Cheung, H Y S Ngan.   

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content in ovarian carcinomas was assessed by quantitative PCR. Results show that mtDNA content in tumour cell was significantly higher than that in normal ovary. Change in mtDNA content was not related with patients' age or tumour stages. However, the average mtDNA copy number in pathological low-grade tumours was over two-fold higher than that in high-grade carcinomas (P=0.012). Moreover, type I carcinomas also had a significantly higher mtDNA copy number than in type II carcinomas (P=0.019). Change in mtDNA content might be an important genetic event in the progression of ovarian carcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17047655      PMCID: PMC2360719          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Mitochondrion has its own genome, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Unlike nuclear genome, mtDNA exists in each cell with several hundreds to more than 10 000 copies. Generally, mtDNA content is tissue-specific and has a steady-state level in each type of tissue. Its maintenance depends mainly on nuclear-encoded factors which usually confers function through the Tfam pathway (Moraes, 2001). Mitochondrial DNA copy number in cell is not under stringent control; and various internal or external factors associated with ATP demand may influence its level, such as: exercise (Lim ), hypoxia (Hoppeler ), and steroid hormones stimulation (Weitzel ). It is well known that carcinoma cells proliferate fast and survive in strict microenvironment, for example, under hypoxic condition. Either down- or upregulation of mtDNA content has been observed in a number of human malignancies (Jones ; Simonnet ; Lee ; Wong ). More importantly, mtDNA content change has also been found to be associated with histological types of gastric carcinoma (Wu ). In our previous studies, we have demonstrated the occurrence of high frequencies of somatic mtDNA mutations in endometrial (Liu ) and ovarian carcinomas (Liu ). In addition, we have also found that mtDNA copy number was significantly elevated in endometrial adenocarcinoma when compared with normal endometrial glandular epithelium (Wang ). To further determine the mtDNA content change and its relationship with cancer, we therefore investigate the mtDNA copy number in primary ovarian carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Frozen samples of 38 cases of primary epithelial ovarian carcinomas and four borderline ovarian tumours diagnosed and treated from January 1991 to December 2004 were retrieved without specific selection for this study. The mean age is 52 (ranging from 26 to 83). The clinical and pathologic characteristics of the 42 patients with ovarian carcinomas are shown in Table 1. In addition, frozen samples of 17 normal ovarian tissues were also used for this study. Use of clinical samples in this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Hong Kong.
Table 1

MtDNA copy number and clinicopathological characteristics of patients

Tissue Code Age Diagnosisa Stageb Gradec Typed MtDNA copy number
TumourOV10049MucinousIBorderlineI983
 OV08668MucinousIBorderlineI4913
 G11975MucinousIIIBorderlineI10516
 G10458Clear cellIBorderlineI4943
 G14731SerousIG1I1337
 G00764SerousIIG1I16772
 OV01663MucinousIG1I8220
 OV07842EndometrioidIIG1I936
 G08739SerousIG2I3539
 G21555SerousIIIG2I9702
 G21338SerousIVG2I6486
 OV00626MucinousIG2I9845
 OV07044EndometrioidIIG2I1976
 G20958AdenocarcinomaIIG2I2103
 G16464SerousIG3II2252
 OV01448SerousIG3II462
 OV09245SerousIIG3II707
 G02057SerousIIIG3II1995
 G11751SerousIIIG3II1064
 G20839SerousIIIG3II7104
 G21245SerousIIIG3II1839
 OV03440SerousIIIG3II4298
 OV07468SerousIIIG3II2925
 G11062SerousIVG3II6771
 G11443SerousIVG3II948
 OV00848SerousIVG3II794
 OV12035SerousIVG3II3735
 G12068SerousIII  1554
 OV00439MucinousIVG3I519
 OV06446EndometrioidIG3II1516
 OV02271EndometrioidIIG3II1659
 G04072EndometrioidIIIG3II1132
 OV00236EndometrioidIII  3816
 OV04244AdenocarcinomaIIIG3II4214
 G01483AdenocarcinomaIIIG3II2565
 G21659Clear cellIG3I3554
 OV03237Clear cellIG3I3611
 OV07663Clear cellIIG3I2591
 OV01254Clear cellIIIG3I2415
 OV09844Poorly differentiatedIIIG3II1770
 OV10847Poorly differentiatedIIG3II493
 OV11048Poorly differentiatedIIIG3II444
        
NormalNor ov01     1640
 Nor ov02     771
 Nor ov03     943
 Nor ov04     856
 Nor ov05     1156
 Nor ov06     920
 Nor ov07     913
 Nor ov08     865
 Nor ov09     737
 Nor ov10     799
 Nor ov11     532
 Nor ov12     1367
 Nor ov13     766
 Nor ov14     809
 Nor ov15     753
 Nor ov16     705
 Nor ov17     1254

Abbreviation: mtDNA=mitochondrial DNA.

The histological types of tumour were classified according to WHO criteria.

The stage of each carcinoma was established according to the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) criteria.

The grades of tumour were classified based on WHO criteria, Grades 1 (well differentiated), 2 (moderately differentiated), and 3 (poorly differentiated). Two carcinoma patients were uninformative on the grading.

The types of tumour were classified based on recent studies (Shih Ie and Kurman, 2004; Bell, 2005), Type I tumours composed of mucinous carcinomas, low-grade serous and endometrioid carcinomas, and clear cell carcinomas. Type II tumours include high-grade serous and endometrioid carcinomas as well as undifferentiated carcinoma. Three adenocarcinomas were treated to be same as serous and endometrioid carcinomas.

In order to obtain pure tumour cell from cancerous tissues, laser capture microdissection (LCM) was employed. The LCM procedure and DNA isolation from LCM procured samples were previously described in detail (Wang ). The recipes and conditions of quantitative PCR reaction were also described in our previous study (Wang ). The raw data were processed using the software accompanying the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequencing Detection System. Linear regression was used to analyse the response of Ct (the cycle number at which fluorescence raises above the baseline level during real-time quantitative PCR) vs the logarithm of the DNA concentration. Pearson's correlation was used to test the relationship between patients' age and mtDNA copy numbers in tumour tissues. The copy number comparison between groups was performed by nonparametric test (Mann–Whitney or Kruskal–Wallis test). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the mtDNA copy number per cell of the 42 ovarian cancer samples and the 17 normal ovarian tissues. Mitochondrial DNA content is significantly higher in ovarian tumours than in normal ovarian tissues (P<0.001) (Figure 1A). The mtDNA copy numbers in tumour tissues have no relationship with patients' ages.
Figure 1

The comparisons of mtDNA copy number in cells among different groups of data. (A) The mean mtDNA copy number in normal ovarian cells (n=17) and ovarian carcinoma cells (n=42) are 929±276 and 3548±3421 copies per cell, respectively. A significant difference was detected (Mann–Whitney test, Z=−3.983, P<0.001). (B) The mtDNA copy number in normal ovarian cells was higher than that in normal endometrial cells (768±573, n=41) (Mann–Whitney test, Z=−2.332, P=0.020). (C) The mean mtDNA copy number in ovarian carcinoma cells (3548±3421, n=42) and endometrial carcinoma cells (2013±2317, n=65) were significantly different (Mann–Whitney test, Z=−3.311, P=0.001). (D) No significant difference of levels of mtDNA copy number between the early-stage tumour (3621±3974, n=20) and advanced stage tumour (3482±2923, n=22) was detected (Mann–Whitney test, Z=−0.327, P=0.743). (E) Significant difference of mtDNA copy number was observed between Grade 3 carcinomas (2361±1799, n=26) and the low-grade tumours (5877±4659, n=14) (Mann–Whitney test, Z=−2.495, P=0.012). (F) The mtDNA content in the type I tumours (4998±4279, n=19) was significantly higher than that in the type II tumours (2318±1930, n=21) (Mann–Whitney test, Z=−2.343, P=0.019).

The levels of mtDNA in normal ovary was higher than that in endometrium (Wang ) (P=0.020) (Figure 1B). In ovarian tumours, an average of 3548±3421 copies of mtDNA was present in tumour cells. The highest and lowest copy numbers of mtDNA in cell were 16 772 and 444, respectively (Table 1). Compared with endometrial carcinomas (average mtDNA copy number=2012±2317 copies) (Wang ), a significantly higher level of mtDNA copy number was found in ovarian carcinomas (P=0.001) (Figure 1C). From the 42 patients, 20 were diagnosed as early-stage tumours, stage I or stage II; whereas 22 patients suffered from advanced carcinomas, stage III or stage IV. There is no significant difference of mtDNA copy numbers between the early-stage tumours (average at 3621±3974 copies per cell) and advanced stage carcinomas (average at 3482±2923 copies per cell) (Figure 1D). As two patients were uninformative on the grading, the analysis was carried out in 40 patients. No significant difference was observed between the four borderline tumours and other invasive carcinomas (Mann–Whitney test, Z=−1.328, P=0.199). In the 26 cases of Grade 3 carcinomas, the mean value of mtDNA content in tumour cells was 2361±1799 copies. In the other 14 patients with lower-grade tumours (including the four borderline tumours), the mean copy of mtDNA molecules in each cell were 5877±4659 copies, it is over two-folds and significantly higher (P=0.012) than that in the higher-grade carcinomas (Figure 1E). The mtDNA copy numbers among different histological subtypes of carcinomas was not significantly different (Kruskal–Wallis test, χ2=8.397, P=0.136, and df=5). Nevertheless, the mucinous tumours seem to have relatively higher level of mtDNA content than other subtypes. In the 42 cases, except two subjects of serous carcinoma uninformative on grading, 19 cases were classified as type I tumours and the other 21 cases were classified as type II tumour (for tumour classification, please see footnotes of Table 1). An average of 4998±4279 copies of mtDNA was detected in type I tumours; whereas, the mean copy number of mtDNA in type II tumours is 2318±1930. It is remarkable lower than that in the type I tumours (P=0.019) (Figure 1F).

DISCUSSION

In this study, mtDNA content in ovarian carcinoma cells was found significantly higher than that in normal ovary. Except for a few reports, the change in mtDNA content does not associate with clinicopathological characteristics. Interestingly, in present study, we found that the mtDNA copy number in high-grade tumours is significantly lower than that in low-grade tumour. As the grade of tumour is a crucial prognostic factor, therefore, mtDNA content change might be an important genetic event in the progression of ovarian carcinoma. Mitochondrial DNA copy number change was also found related with other human diseases. A significantly lower level of mtDNA content was observed in oocytes from women with ovarian insufficiency (May-Panloup ). In addition, increased sperm mtDNA content was observed in male infertility (May-Panloup ). The findings suggested that the change of mtDNA copy number was related with the impairment of cellular physiologic function. A probable explanation is that the change in mtDNA content would likely cause or be caused by the deficiencies in oxidative phosphorylation activity. Reactive oxygen species generation in mitochondria, which lead to DNA oxidative damage in cells, could thus impair cell function. The significantly different levels of mtDNA content in different grades of tumour may be accounted for either by the downregulation in mtDNA replication in the high-grade tumours, or upregulation in mtDNA replication in low-grade tumours. Detection of many mtDNA alterations in the premalignant or preinvasive lesions indicated that mtDNA alterations could be an early genetic event in tumorigenesis (Chen ; Ha ; Durham ). Mitochondrial DNA copy number was suggested to be increased by a feedback mechanism that compensates for the defective respiratory system owing to mutated mtDNA (Lee ). So, it is possible that mtDNA copy number increased in early- and lower-grade malignancies. On the other hand, long-term exposure to severe environmental insult such as hypoxia decreases the mitochondrial content of muscle fibres (Hoppeler ). Undoubtedly, mitochondria are oxygen sensitive and the mtDNA content decrease might account for hypoxia. So, an alternative explanation of the decrease of mtDNA copy number in high-grade tumour is due to the fact that such tumour has rapid proliferation rate, and thus, survives in more severe hypoxia microenvironment leading to the downregulation of the mtDNA replication. The most important finding in this study is the association between decreased mtDNA copy number with high grade and histological subtype of ovarian carcinoma. The histopathological phenotypes of ovarian carcinoma are complex. The epithelial-derived tumours including serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, transitional, squamous, mixed, and undifferentiated types comprise the majority of malignant tumours. Each of these histological subtypes is associated with distinct molecular genetic alterations (Shih Ie and Kurman, 2004; Bell, 2005). Based on recent clinicopathological and molecular studies, it has been proposed that surface epithelial tumours could be divided into two broad categories, type I and type II tumours. Mutations in KRAS and BRAF have been found to be common in low-grade serous and mucinous ovarian carcinomas (Gemignani ; Sieben ). KRAS belongs to RAS families which coding proto-oncogene that functions as a relay switch that transduces various growth signals in the cell surface to the nucleus through activation of the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK–MAP kinase signalling pathway. Till now, no report connected the regulation of mtDNA replication with the genetic alterations in RAS–RAF pathway. As shown above, type I tumour had a significantly higher mtDNA copy number than that in type II tumour. So, whether or not a potential relationship between the genetic alterations in RAS–RAF pathway and mtDNA content change would be an interesting field to be explored. On the other hand, mutations in the tumour suppressor molecule p53 were detected in type II tumours frequently (Shih Ie and Kurman, 2004). Recent studies provided the potential mechanistic explanation. p53 binding sequence was identified in mtDNA suggested that p53 might be involved in the regulation of mitochondrial transcription and replication (Heyne ). In addition, p53 might also enhance the DNA replication function of mtDNA polymerase γ through their interaction. So, the loss of p53 owing to the mutations in the type II tumours could result in the decrease of mtDNA replication (Achanta ). Taken together, the finding of grade and histological associated change in mtDNA copy number provide a novel insight of the role of mtDNA alterations in cancer progression. Mitochondrial DNA content in cell may be potentially used as a tool to predict prognosis. Mechanisms of mtDNA maintenance in carcinoma cells warrant further investigation.
  24 in total

1.  Molecular alterations in mitochondrial DNA of hepatocellular carcinomas: is there a correlation with clinicopathological profile?

Authors:  L-J C Wong; D-J Tan; R-K Bai; K-T Yeh; J Chang
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Identification of a putative p53 binding sequence within the human mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  K Heyne; S Mannebach; E Wuertz; K X Knaup; M Mahyar-Roemer; K Roemer
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  The increase of mitochondrial DNA content in endometrial adenocarcinoma cells: a quantitative study using laser-captured microdissected tissues.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Vincent W S Liu; Wei-Cheng Xue; Percy C K Tsang; Annie N Y Cheung; Hextan Y S Ngan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  Origins and molecular pathology of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Debra A Bell
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Low oocyte mitochondrial DNA content in ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  P May-Panloup; M F Chrétien; C Jacques; C Vasseur; Y Malthièry; P Reynier
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Mitochondrial DNA mutations and mitochondrial DNA depletion in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chew-Wun Wu; Pen-Hui Yin; Wen-Yi Hung; Anna Fen-Yau Li; Shu-Hui Li; Chin-Wen Chi; Yau-Huei Wei; Hsin-Chen Lee
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 7.  Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis.

Authors:  Ie-Ming Shih; Robert J Kurman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Role of KRAS and BRAF gene mutations in mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Mary L Gemignani; Alan C Schlaerth; Faina Bogomolniy; Richard R Barakat; Oscar Lin; Robert Soslow; Ennapandam Venkatraman; Jeff Boyd
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Somatic mutations in the D-loop and decrease in the copy number of mitochondrial DNA in human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hsin-Chen Lee; Shu-Hui Li; Jin-Ching Lin; Cheng-Chung Wu; Dah-Cherg Yeh; Yau-Huei Wei
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  High frequency of mitochondrial genome instability in human endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  V W S Liu; H J Yang; Y Wang; P C K Tsang; A N Y Cheung; P M Chiu; T Y Ng; L C Wong; P Nagley; H Y S Ngan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  54 in total

1.  Acquisition of temozolomide chemoresistance in gliomas leads to remodeling of mitochondrial electron transport chain.

Authors:  Claudia R Oliva; Susan E Nozell; Anne Diers; Samuel G McClugage; Jann N Sarkaria; James M Markert; Victor M Darley-Usmar; Shannon M Bailey; G Yancey Gillespie; Aimee Landar; Corinne E Griguer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Defining the momiome: Promiscuous information transfer by mobile mitochondria and the mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  Bhupendra Singh; Josephine S Modica-Napolitano; Keshav K Singh
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Functional implications of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generated by oncogenic viruses.

Authors:  Young Bong Choi; Edward William Harhaj
Journal:  Front Biol (Beijing)       Date:  2014-12

4.  Genome-wide mitochondrial DNA sequence variations and lower expression of OXPHOS genes predict mitochondrial dysfunction in oral cancer tissue.

Authors:  Esita Chattopadhyay; Navonil De Sarkar; Richa Singh; Anindita Ray; Roshni Roy; Ranjan Rashmi Paul; Mousumi Pal; Sandip Ghose; Subhrendu Ghosh; Debajyoti Kabiraj; Raja Banerjee; Bidyut Roy
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 5.  Mitochondrial determinants of cancer health disparities.

Authors:  Aaheli Roy Choudhury; Keshav K Singh
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 15.707

6.  Mitochondrial DNA content: its genetic heritability and association with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinliang Xing; Meng Chen; Christopher G Wood; Jie Lin; Margaret R Spitz; Jianzhong Ma; Christopher I Amos; Peter G Shields; Neal L Benowitz; Jian Gu; Mariza de Andrade; Gary E Swan; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mitochondrial copy number and risk of breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Mary Platek; Amjad Mahasneh; Christine B Ambrosone; Hua Zhao
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 4.160

8.  Decreased mitochondrial DNA content in blood samples of patients with stage I breast cancer.

Authors:  Peng Xia; Han-Xiang An; Cheng-Xue Dang; Ramin Radpour; Corina Kohler; Emmanouil Fokas; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Wolfgang Holzgreve; Xiao Yan Zhong
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Decreased mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid and increased oxidative damage in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Hsu-Heng Yen; Kai-Lun Shih; Ta-Tsung Lin; Wei-Wen Su; Maw-Soan Soon; Chin-San Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Levels of plasma circulating cell free nuclear and mitochondrial DNA as potential biomarkers for breast tumors.

Authors:  Corina Kohler; Ramin Radpour; Zeinab Barekati; Reza Asadollahi; Johannes Bitzer; Edward Wight; Nicole Bürki; Claude Diesch; Wolfgang Holzgreve; Xiao Yan Zhong
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.