OBJECTIVE: To compare thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) gene polymorphism and expression in colorectal cancer (CRC), and normal mucosa in chemotherapy-naïve patients. METHODS: TS, DPD and TP mRNA expression was analysed by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in primary CRC and adjacent normal tissues from 53 patients with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as housekeeping gene. TS promoter (TSER and C/G SNP) and DPD IVS14+1G>A genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism assays. Moreover, the correlation between TS, DPD and TP expression and cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil was evaluated in Colo 320, HT-29, CaCo-2 and SW620 human CRC cell lines. RESULTS: TP and DPD mRNA expression was significantly different in tumour and normal tissue (7.51+/-13.50 vs. 1.10+/-0.57, P<0.05 and 0.60+/-0.63 vs. 1.17+/-0.55, P<0.0001, respectively), whereas no differences were observed in TS mRNA levels. High-grade, undifferentiated tumours (WHO grade 3) had significantly higher mRNA levels of TS with respect to moderately differentiated (WHO grade 2) carcinomas (0.38+/-0.37 vs. 0.00+/-0.44, respectively; P<0.05). Noteworthy, TS mRNA expression was significantly decreased (P<0.05) in homozygous TSER*3G/3G (-0.35+/-0.35) with respect to pooled homozygous TSER*2/2 and heterozygous TSER*2/3 genotypes (0.14+/-0.41). In-vitro results showed a higher sensitivity to 5-FU of cell lines with the lowest TS expression. CONCLUSIONS: The present results demonstrated significant differences in DPD and TP gene expression between normal mucosa and tumour samples, while TSER*3G/3G and high-grade histology were associated with significant variation in TS gene expression in tumour samples.
OBJECTIVE: To compare thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) gene polymorphism and expression in colorectal cancer (CRC), and normal mucosa in chemotherapy-naïve patients. METHODS:TS, DPD and TP mRNA expression was analysed by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction in primary CRC and adjacent normal tissues from 53 patients with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as housekeeping gene. TS promoter (TSER and C/G SNP) and DPD IVS14+1G>A genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism assays. Moreover, the correlation between TS, DPD and TP expression and cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil was evaluated in Colo 320, HT-29, CaCo-2 and SW620 human CRC cell lines. RESULTS:TP and DPD mRNA expression was significantly different in tumour and normal tissue (7.51+/-13.50 vs. 1.10+/-0.57, P<0.05 and 0.60+/-0.63 vs. 1.17+/-0.55, P<0.0001, respectively), whereas no differences were observed in TS mRNA levels. High-grade, undifferentiated tumours (WHO grade 3) had significantly higher mRNA levels of TS with respect to moderately differentiated (WHO grade 2) carcinomas (0.38+/-0.37 vs. 0.00+/-0.44, respectively; P<0.05). Noteworthy, TS mRNA expression was significantly decreased (P<0.05) in homozygous TSER*3G/3G (-0.35+/-0.35) with respect to pooled homozygous TSER*2/2 and heterozygous TSER*2/3 genotypes (0.14+/-0.41). In-vitro results showed a higher sensitivity to 5-FU of cell lines with the lowest TS expression. CONCLUSIONS: The present results demonstrated significant differences in DPD and TP gene expression between normal mucosa and tumour samples, while TSER*3G/3G and high-grade histology were associated with significant variation in TS gene expression in tumour samples.
Authors: A Fariña-Sarasqueta; M J E M Gosens; E Moerland; I van Lijnschoten; V E P P Lemmens; G D Slooter; H J T Rutten; Adriaan J C van den Brule Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Marie S Thearle; Pamela U Freda; Jeffrey N Bruce; Steven R Isaacson; Yoomi Lee; Robert L Fine Journal: Pituitary Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: R Soong; N Shah; M Salto-Tellez; B C Tai; R A Soo; H C Han; S S Ng; W L Tan; N Zeps; D Joseph; R B Diasio; B Iacopetta Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M Gusella; A C Frigo; C Bolzonella; R Marinelli; C Barile; A Bononi; G Crepaldi; D Menon; L Stievano; S Toso; F Pasini; E Ferrazzi; R Padrini Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 7.640