Literature DB >> 17047042

High-risk melanoma susceptibility genes and pancreatic cancer, neural system tumors, and uveal melanoma across GenoMEL.

Alisa M Goldstein1, May Chan, Mark Harland, Elizabeth M Gillanders, Nicholas K Hayward, Marie-Francoise Avril, Esther Azizi, Giovanna Bianchi-Scarra, D Timothy Bishop, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, William Bruno, Donato Calista, Lisa A Cannon Albright, Florence Demenais, David E Elder, Paola Ghiorzo, Nelleke A Gruis, Johan Hansson, David Hogg, Elizabeth A Holland, Peter A Kanetsky, Richard F Kefford, Maria Teresa Landi, Julie Lang, Sancy A Leachman, Rona M Mackie, Veronica Magnusson, Graham J Mann, Kristin Niendorf, Julia Newton Bishop, Jane M Palmer, Susana Puig, Joan A Puig-Butille, Femke A de Snoo, Mitchell Stark, Hensin Tsao, Margaret A Tucker, Linda Whitaker, Emanuel Yakobson.   

Abstract

GenoMEL, comprising major familial melanoma research groups from North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia has created the largest familial melanoma sample yet available to characterize mutations in the high-risk melanoma susceptibility genes CDKN2A/alternate reading frames (ARF), which encodes p16 and p14ARF, and CDK4 and to evaluate their relationship with pancreatic cancer (PC), neural system tumors (NST), and uveal melanoma (UM). This study included 466 families (2,137 patients) with at least three melanoma patients from 17 GenoMEL centers. Overall, 41% (n = 190) of families had mutations; most involved p16 (n = 178). Mutations in CDK4 (n = 5) and ARF (n = 7) occurred at similar frequencies (2-3%). There were striking differences in mutations across geographic locales. The proportion of families with the most frequent founder mutation(s) of each locale differed significantly across the seven regions (P = 0.0009). Single founder CDKN2A mutations were predominant in Sweden (p.R112_L113insR, 92% of family's mutations) and the Netherlands (c.225_243del19, 90% of family's mutations). France, Spain, and Italy had the same most frequent mutation (p.G101W). Similarly, Australia and United Kingdom had the same most common mutations (p.M53I, c.IVS2-105A>G, p.R24P, and p.L32P). As reported previously, there was a strong association between PC and CDKN2A mutations (P < 0.0001). This relationship differed by mutation. In contrast, there was little evidence for an association between CDKN2A mutations and NST (P = 0.52) or UM (P = 0.25). There was a marginally significant association between NST and ARF (P = 0.05). However, this particular evaluation had low power and requires confirmation. This GenoMEL study provides the most extensive characterization of mutations in high-risk melanoma susceptibility genes in families with three or more melanoma patients yet available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17047042     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  139 in total

Review 1.  A brief history of melanoma: from mummies to mutations.

Authors:  Vito W Rebecca; Vernon K Sondak; Keiran S M Smalley
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 2.  Driver mutations in melanoma: lessons learned from bench-to-bedside studies.

Authors:  Janice M Mehnert; Harriet M Kluger
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Genetic predisposition to pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Paola Ghiorzo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Risk of non-melanoma cancers in first-degree relatives of CDKN2A mutation carriers.

Authors:  Bhramar Mukherjee; John Oliver Delancey; Leon Raskin; Jessica Everett; Joanne Jeter; Colin B Begg; Irene Orlow; Marianne Berwick; Bruce K Armstrong; Anne Kricker; Loraine D Marrett; Robert C Millikan; Hoda Anton Culver; Stefano Rosso; Roberto Zanetti; Peter A Kanetsky; Lynn From; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Pancreatic cancer and the FAMMM syndrome.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Ramon M Fusaro; Jane F Lynch; Randall Brand
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Assessment of functional effects of unclassified genetic variants.

Authors:  Fergus J Couch; Lene Juel Rasmussen; Robert Hofstra; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Marc S Greenblatt; Niels de Wind
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 7.  Germline mutations predisposing to melanoma.

Authors:  Atrin Toussi; Nicole Mans; Jeanna Welborn; Maija Kiuru
Journal:  J Cutan Pathol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 1.587

8.  Improvement of Genetic Testing for Cutaneous Melanoma in Countries With Low to Moderate Incidence: The Rule of 2 vs the Rule of 3.

Authors:  Juliette Delaunay; Ludovic Martin; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Gerard Duru; Olivier Ingster; Luc Thomas
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 9.  The molecular pathology of melanoma: an integrated taxonomy of melanocytic neoplasia.

Authors:  Boris C Bastian
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 23.472

10.  Multiple primary cutaneous melanomas in patients with FAMMM syndrome and sporadic atypical mole syndrome (AMS): what's worse?

Authors:  Georgi Tchernev; Julian Ananiev; José-Carlos Cardoso; Anastasiya Atanasova Chokoeva; Stanislav Philipov; Plamen Kolev Penev; Torello Lotti; Uwe Wollina
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2014-08-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.