Literature DB >> 17046981

Determining RuBisCO activation kinetics and other rate and equilibrium constants by simultaneous multiple non-linear regression of a kinetic model.

Dennis McNevin1, Susanne von Caemmerer, Graham Farquhar.   

Abstract

The forward and reverse rate constants involved in carbamylation, activation, carboxylation, and inhibition of D-ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) have been estimated by a new technique of simultaneous non-linear regression of a differential equation kinetic model to multiple experimental data. Parameters predicted by the model fitted to data from purified spinach enzyme in vitro included binding affinity constants for non-substrate CO2 and Mg2+ of 200+/-80 microM and 700+/-200 microM, respectively, as well as a turnover number (k(cat)) of 3.3+/-0.5 s(-1), a Michaelis half-saturation constant for carboxylation (K(M,C)) of 10+/-4 microM and a Michaelis constant for RuBP binding (K(M,RuBP)) of 1.5+/-0.5 microM. These and other constants agree well with previously measured values where they exist. The model is then used to show that slow inactivation of RuBisCO (fallover) in oxygen-free conditions at low concentrations of CO2 and Mg2+ is due to decarbamylation and binding of RuBP to uncarbamylated enzyme. In spite of RuBP binding more tightly to uncarbamylated enzyme than to the activated form, RuBisCO is activated at high concentrations of CO2 and Mg2+. This apparent paradox is resolved by considering activation kinetics and the fact that while RuBP binds tightly but slowly to uncarbamylated enzyme, it binds fast and loosely to activated enzyme. This modelling technique is presented as a new method for determining multiple kinetic data simultaneously from a limited experimental data set. The method can be used to compare the properties of RuBisCO from different species quickly and easily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17046981     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  8 in total

1.  Chemoproteomic identification of CO2-dependent lysine carboxylation in proteins.

Authors:  Dustin T King; Sha Zhu; Darryl B Hardie; Jesús E Serrano-Negrón; Zarina Madden; Subramania Kolappan; David J Vocadlo
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 16.174

2.  Regulation of β-phellandrene synthase gene expression, recombinant protein accumulation, and monoterpene hydrocarbons production in Synechocystis transformants.

Authors:  Cinzia Formighieri; Anastasios Melis
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Transcriptomic Response of Nitrosomonas europaea Transitioned from Ammonia- to Oxygen-Limited Steady-State Growth.

Authors:  Christopher J Sedlacek; Andrew T Giguere; Michael D Dobie; Brett L Mellbye; Rebecca V Ferrell; Dagmar Woebken; Luis A Sayavedra-Soto; Peter J Bottomley; Holger Daims; Michael Wagner; Petra Pjevac
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.496

4.  The Catalytic Role of RuBisCO for in situ CO2 Recycling in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ju-Jiun Pang; Jong-Shik Shin; Si-Yu Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-30

5.  The Expression of TaRca2-α Gene Associated with Net Photosynthesis Rate, Biomass and Grain Yield in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Field Conditions.

Authors:  Iqbal Saeed; Daoura Goudia Bachir; Liang Chen; Yin-Gang Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Directions for Optimization of Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation: RuBisCO's Efficiency May Not Be So Constrained After All.

Authors:  Peter L Cummins; Babu Kannappan; Jill E Gready
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  A penalty on photosynthetic growth in fluctuating light.

Authors:  Percival J Graham; Brian Nguyen; Thomas Burdyny; David Sinton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Commentary: Directions for Optimization of Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation: RuBisCO's Efficiency May Not Be So Constrained After All.

Authors:  Guillaume G Tcherkez; Camille Bathellier; Graham D Farquhar; George H Lorimer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.753

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.