| Literature DB >> 17046845 |
Patrick C Y Woo1, Liliane M W Chung, Jade L L Teng, Herman Tse, Sherby S Y Pang, Veronica Y T Lau, Vanessa W K Wong, Kwok-ling Kam, Susanna K P Lau, Kwok-Yung Yuen.
Abstract
This study is the first study that provides useful guidelines to clinical microbiologists and technicians on the usefulness of full 16S rRNA sequencing, 5'-end 527-bp 16S rRNA sequencing and the existing MicroSeq full and 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system (MicroSeq, Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems Division, Foster City, California, USA) databases for the identification of all existing medically important anaerobic bacteria. Full and 527-bp 16S rRNA sequencing are able to identify 52-63% of 130 Gram-positive anaerobic rods, 72-73% of 86 Gram-negative anaerobic rods and 78% of 23 anaerobic cocci. The existing MicroSeq databases are able to identify only 19-25% of 130 Gram-positive anaerobic rods, 38% of 86 Gram-negative anaerobic rods and 39% of 23 anaerobic cocci. These represent only 45-46% of those that should be confidently identified by full and 527-bp 16S rRNA sequencing. To improve the usefulness of MicroSeq, bacterial species that should be confidently identified by full and/or 527-bp 16S rRNA sequencing but not included in the existing MicroSeq databases should be included.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 17046845 PMCID: PMC1994535 DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2006.038653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Pathol ISSN: 0021-9746 Impact factor: 3.411