Literature DB >> 17046192

Therapeutic results in low-rectal cancer patients treated with abdominosacral resection are similar to those obtained by means of anterior resection in mid- and upper-rectal cancer cases.

M Bebenek1, M Pudełko, K Cisarz, A Balcerzak, W Tupikowski, L Wojciechowski, A Stankowska, R Tarkowski, R Szulc.   

Abstract

AIMS: To present the experiences of the Regional Comprehensive Cancer Center in Wroclaw with abdominosacral resection (ASR) carried out in low-rectal cancer patients.
METHODS: Rectal cancer patients (n=294) were operated on by the same surgical team using the standardized TME technique between May 5, 1998 and February 23, 2001. Depending on the distance from the anal verge, the primary tumor was removed by means of standard abdominal resection (AR-mid- and upper-rectal cancers) or abdominosacral resection (ASR-low-rectal cancers). The patients who underwent the different operative procedures were comparable in terms of distributions of age, gender, tumor infiltration depth and regional lymph node involvement with no significant statistical difference between the groups.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven cases were excluded from the analysis of survival based on exclusion criteria defined. Consequently, 197 cases were left for further analysis, including 154 patients operated on by AR and 43 who underwent ASR. AR and ASR patients did not differ significantly in terms of postoperative morbidity (11% and 14%, respectively), observed (57.1% vs. 60.4%) and relative 5-year survivals (74.3% vs. 73.2%) and the cumulative 5-year local recurrence rate (5.8% vs. 4.7%).
CONCLUSION: The combined use of the modern TME technique and the "historical" abdominosacral excision of the rectum seems to give new, potentially attractive perspectives for successful surgical treatment of low-rectal cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17046192     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  5 in total

1.  The effect of increased body mass index values on surgical outcomes after radical resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Xubing Zhang; Qingbin Wu; Chaoyang Gu; Tao Hu; Liang Bi; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Preoperative treatment does not improve the therapeutic results of abdominosacral amputation of the rectum.

Authors:  Marek Bębenek; Wiesław Tupikowski; Karol Cisarż; Alicja Balcerzak; Leszek Wojciechowski; Anna Stankowska; Radosław Tarkowski
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Intraoperative blood loss during surgical treatment of low-rectal cancer by abdominosacral resection is higher than during extra-levator abdominosacral amputation of the rectum.

Authors:  Marek Bębenek
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 4.  Robotic-Assisted vs. Standard Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 19,731 Patients.

Authors:  Kamil Safiejko; Radoslaw Tarkowski; Maciej Koselak; Marcin Juchimiuk; Aleksander Tarasik; Michal Pruc; Jacek Smereka; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Standard versus extralevator abdominoperineal excision and oncologic outcomes for patients with distal rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunfeng Zhang; Duo Wang; Lizhe Zhu; Bin Wang; Xiaoxia Ma; Bohui Shi; Yu Yan; Can Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.