Literature DB >> 17045729

Endometrial ablation in England--coming of age? An examination of hospital episode statistics 1989/1990 to 2004/2005.

Peter C Reid1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe numbers and trends in endometrial ablation performed for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in England.
DESIGN: Examination of National Health Service (NHS) Hospital Episode Statistics. Number of hysterectomies and endometrial ablation procedures performed each year from 1989/1990 to 2004/2005.
RESULTS: Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation peaked in 1992/1993 before falling significantly to a low in 1997/1998. Since then the total number of procedures has increased by 250% and of the 9701 endometrial ablations performed in 2004/2005 over half (5457) are now second-generation techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: Endometrial ablation is now more common than hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding and second-generation methods are now more commonly performed than hysteroscopic endometrial ablation. There is every indication that endometrial ablation will continue to increase in practice in England.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17045729     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Rosalie J Fergusson; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-29

Review 2.  Hysterectomy, endometrial destruction, and levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) for heavy menstrual bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis of data from individual patients.

Authors:  L J Middleton; R Champaneria; J P Daniels; S Bhattacharya; K G Cooper; N H Hilken; P O'Donovan; M Gannon; R Gray; K S Khan; J Abbott; J Barrington; S Bhattacharya; M Y Bongers; J-L Brun; R Busfield; M Sowter; T J Clark; J Cooper; K G Cooper; S L Corson; K Dickersin; N Dwyer; M Gannon; J Hawe; R Hurskainen; W R Meyer; H O'Connor; S Pinion; A M Sambrook; W H Tam; I A A van Zon-Rabelink; E Zupi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-16

3.  Endometrial cancer after endometrial ablation vs medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding.

Authors:  Robert L Dood; Clarisa R Gracia; Mary D Sammel; Kevin Haynes; Suneeta Senapati; Brian L Strom
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 4.  Second generation endometrial ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding: network meta-analysis.

Authors:  J P Daniels; L J Middleton; R Champaneria; K S Khan; K Cooper; B W J Mol; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-23

5.  The surgical treatment of idiopathic abnormal uterine bleeding: An analysis of 88 000 patients from the French exhaustive national hospital discharge database from 2009 to 2015.

Authors:  Lucie de Léotoing; Gwendoline Chaize; Jérôme Fernandes; Dusan Toth; Philippe Descamps; Gil Dubernard; Thomas Lafon; Ludovic Lamarsalle; Hervé Fernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Rosalie J Fergusson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.