Literature DB >> 17044151

Lay concepts in informed consent to biomedical research: the capacity to understand and appreciate risk.

Ana Iltis1.   

Abstract

Persons generally must give their informed consent to participate in research. To provide informed consent persons must be given information regarding the study in simple, lay language. Consent must be voluntary, and persons giving consent must be legally competent to consent and possess the capacity to understand and appreciate the information. This paper examines the relationship between the obligation to disclose information regarding risks and the requirement that persons have the capacity to understand and appreciate the information. There has been insufficient attention to the extent to which persons must be able to understand and appreciate study information in order to have their consent deemed valid when the information is provided in simple, lay language. This paper argues that (1) the capacity to understand and appreciate information that should be deemed necessary to give valid consent should be defined by the capacity of the typical, cognitively normal adult and (2) the capacity of the typical, cognitively normal adult to understand and appreciate the concept of risk is limited. Therefore, (3) all things being equal, potential subjects must possess a limited capacity to understand and appreciate risk to be deemed competent to consent to research participation. (4) In some cases investigators ought to require that persons possess a greater than typical capacity to understand and appreciate risk.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17044151     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00493.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  6 in total

1.  Addressing risks to advance mental health research.

Authors:  Ana S Iltis; Sahana Misra; Laura B Dunn; Gregory K Brown; Amy Campbell; Sarah A Earll; Anne Glowinski; Whitney B Hadley; Ronald Pies; James M Dubois
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 21.596

2.  Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: findings of focus group participants.

Authors:  Ellen Iverson; Aaron Celious; Carie R Kennedy; Erica Shehane; Alexander Eastman; Victoria Warren; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Brian Clarridge; Bradley D Freeman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Accepting risk in clinical research: is the gene therapy field becoming too risk-averse?

Authors:  Claire T Deakin; Ian E Alexander; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Informed consent and fresh egg donation for stem cell research.

Authors:  Katherine Carroll; Catherine Waldby
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.352

5.  Payments to normal healthy volunteers in phase 1 trials: avoiding undue influence while distributing fairly the burdens of research participation.

Authors:  Ana S Iltis
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2009-02-03

6.  Jordanians' Perspectives On Open Consent In Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Nasr Alrabadi; Hanin Makhlouf; Omar F Khabour; Karem H Alzoubi
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2019-12-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.