Literature DB >> 17043330

Counterpoint: the classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is not correct.

G L Brengelmann.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 17043330     DOI： 10.1152/japplphysiol.00698a.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN： 0161-7567


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Mean systemic pressure: we can now estimate it, but for what?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  CrossTalk opposing view: Guyton's venous return curves should not be taught.

Authors:  Daniel A Beard; Eric O Feigl
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Understanding Guyton's venous return curves.

Authors:  Daniel A Beard; Eric O Feigl
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Guyton's venous return curves should be taught at medical schools (complete English translation of Japanese version).

Authors:  Kenji Sunagawa
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 5.  Determinants of systemic venous return and the impact of positive pressure ventilation.

Authors:  David Berger; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Continuing the Debate: Branko Furst's Alternative Model And the Role of the Heart.

Authors:  Rafael Dalmau
Journal:  P T       Date:  2017-07

Review 7.  Venous return and the physical connection between distribution of segmental pressures and volumes.

Authors:  George L Brengelmann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Haemodynamic responses to exercise, ATP infusion and thigh compression in humans: insight into the role of muscle mechanisms on cardiovascular function.

Authors:  José González-Alonso; Stefan P Mortensen; Tina D Jeppesen; Leena Ali; Horace Barker; Rasmus Damsgaard; Niels H Secher; Ellen A Dawson; Stéphane P Dufour
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Bench-to-bedside review: An approach to hemodynamic monitoring--Guyton at the bedside.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Volume and its relationship to cardiac output and venous return.

Authors:  S Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 9.097
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.