Literature DB >> 17043096

Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk in a network of case-control studies.

S Gallus1, L Scotti2, E Negri2, R Talamini3, S Franceschi4, M Montella5, A Giacosa6, L Dal Maso3, C La Vecchia7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of sweeteners on cancer risk has been widely debated over the last few decades. To provide additional information on saccharin and other sweeteners (mainly aspartame), we considered data from a large network of case-control studies.
METHODS: An integrated network of case-control studies has been conducted between 1991 and 2004 in Italy. Cases were 598 patients with incident, histologically confirmed cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx, 304 of the oesophagus, 1225 of the colon, 728 of the rectum, 460 of the larynx, 2569 of the breast, 1031 of the ovary, 1294 of the prostate and 767 of the kidney (renal cell carcinoma). Controls were 7028 patients (3301 men and 3727 women) admitted to the same hospitals as cases for acute, non-neoplastic disorders. Odds ratios (ORs), and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were derived by unconditional logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The ORs for consumption of saccharin were 0.83 (95% CI 0.30-2.29) for cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx, 1.58 (95% CI 0.59-4.25) for oesophageal, 0.95 (95% CI 0.67-1.35) for colon, 0.93 (95% CI 0.60-1.45) for rectal, 1.55 (95% CI 0.76-3.16) for laryngeal, 1.01 (95% CI 0.77-1.33) for breast, 0.46 (95% CI 0.29-0.74) for ovarian, 0.91 (95% CI 0.59-1.40) for prostate and 0.79 (95% CI 0.49-1.28) for kidney cancer. The ORs for consumption of other sweeteners, mainly aspartame, were 0.77 (95% CI 0.39-1.53) for cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx, 0.77 (95% CI 0.34-1.75) for oesophageal, 0.90 (95% CI 0.70-1.16) for colon, 0.71 (95% CI 0.50-1.02) for rectal, 1.62 (95% CI 0.84-3.14) for laryngeal, 0.80 (95% CI 0.65-0.97) for breast, 0.75 (95% CI 0.56-1.00) for ovarian, 1.23 (95% CI 0.86-1.76) for prostate and 1.03 (95% CI 0.73-1.46) for kidney cancer. A significant inverse trend in risk for increasing categories of total sweeteners was found for breast and ovarian cancer, and a direct one for laryngeal cancer.
CONCLUSION: The present work indicates a lack of association between saccharin, aspartame and other sweeteners and the risk of several common neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17043096     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdl346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  10 in total

1.  Cytotoxic effects of aspartame on human cervical carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Muthuraman Pandurangan; Gansukh Enkhtaivan; Doo Hwan Kim
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Impact of substituting added sugar in carbonated soft drinks by intense sweeteners in young adults in the Netherlands: example of a benefit-risk approach.

Authors:  Marieke A Hendriksen; Mariken J Tijhuis; Heidi P Fransen; Hans Verhagen; Jeljer Hoekstra
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Sweet taste receptor gene variation and aspartame taste in primates and other species.

Authors:  Xia Li; Alexander A Bachmanov; Kenji Maehashi; Weihua Li; Raymond Lim; Joseph G Brand; Gary K Beauchamp; Danielle R Reed; Chloe Thai; Wely B Floriano
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Intake of artificial sweeteners among adults is associated with reduced odds of gastrointestinal luminal cancers: a meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies.

Authors:  Adam Tepler; Gila Hoffman; Shawn Jindal; Neeraj Narula; Shailja C Shah
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Non-nutritive sweeteners for diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Szimonetta Lohner; Daniela Kuellenberg de Gaudry; Ingrid Toews; Tamas Ferenci; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-25

6.  No Effect of Dietary Aspartame or Stevia on Pancreatic Acinar Carcinoma Development, Growth, or Induced Mortality in a Murine Model.

Authors:  James Dooley; Vasiliki Lagou; Tom Dresselaers; Katinka A van Dongen; Uwe Himmelreich; Adrian Liston
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  To a Question on the Mechanism of the Antimicrobial Action of Ortho-Benzoic Sulfimide.

Authors:  Ekaterina Y Kasap; Dmitry V Grishin
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-13

8.  Life-span exposure to low doses of aspartame beginning during prenatal life increases cancer effects in rats.

Authors:  Morando Soffritti; Fiorella Belpoggi; Eva Tibaldi; Davide Degli Esposti; Michelina Lauriola
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Health outcomes of non-nutritive sweeteners: analysis of the research landscape.

Authors:  Szimonetta Lohner; Ingrid Toews; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Ingrid Toews; Szimonetta Lohner; Daniela Küllenberg de Gaudry; Harriet Sommer; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-01-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.