Literature DB >> 17042179

Proficiency testing as a tool to assess the performance of visual TLC quantitation estimates.

Peter Risha1, Zera Msuya, Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda, Thomas Layloff.   

Abstract

The use of rapid and inexpensive nonlaboratory-based screening tests for drug quality assessments is recommended as a component of a drug quality assurance program in poor resource settings. We have established routine Minilab test procedures to screen product quality and a proficiency testing program to determine the competency of the inspectors and reliability of results. Samples for the proficiency testing were prepared by pulverizing a standard reference tablet of the appropriate drug and making serial dilutions with starch to obtain concentrations of 0, 40, and 100%. The samples, which were labeled only with the drug name and an identifying letter, were given to inspectors for quality screening using Minilab procedures. In round 1 of the proficiency test, only 3 of 28 substandard samples were correctly identified. Round 2 of the proficiency test, which was administered after a performance qualification test for the analytical method, showed much improvement: 19 of 27 substandard drugs were correctly identified, while 5 out of 9 inspectors made the correct inference on the quality of 45 samples. However, in both rounds, 2 inspectors failed to identify substandard samples, indicating that their technical competencies need to be improved for the reliability of the results. Although the thin-layer chromatography screening methods provide a rapid means for drug quality assessment, they need to be put in the hands of competent users. The inclusion of a proficiency test in the screening program provides a measure of determining competency of the personnel and reliability of the results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17042179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  4 in total

Review 1.  Essential medicines for universal health coverage.

Authors:  Veronika J Wirtz; Hans V Hogerzeil; Andrew L Gray; Maryam Bigdeli; Cornelis P de Joncheere; Margaret A Ewen; Martha Gyansa-Lutterodt; Sun Jing; Vera L Luiza; Regina M Mbindyo; Helene Möller; Corrina Moucheraud; Bernard Pécoul; Lembit Rägo; Arash Rashidian; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Peter N Stephens; Yot Teerawattananon; Ellen F M 't Hoen; Anita K Wagner; Prashant Yadav; Michael R Reich
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Global Pharma Health Fund Minilab™ in Assessing Pharmacopoeial Quality of Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Hui Pan; William Ba-Thein
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Field detection devices for screening the quality of medicines: a systematic review.

Authors:  Serena Vickers; Matthew Bernier; Stephen Zambrzycki; Facundo M Fernandez; Paul N Newton; Céline Caillet
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-08-29

4.  A comparative field evaluation of six medicine quality screening devices in Laos.

Authors:  Céline Caillet; Serena Vickers; Stephen Zambrzycki; Facundo M Fernández; Vayouly Vidhamaly; Kem Boutsamay; Phonepasith Boupha; Pimnara Peerawaranun; Mavuto Mukaka; Paul N Newton
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-09-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.