PURPOSE: Trastuzumab is the cornerstone for treatment of women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer, both in the adjuvant and in the metastatic settings. The accurate assessment of HER2 is, therefore, critical to identifying patients who may benefit from trastuzumab-based therapy. This project aimed to determine the optimal scoring method for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. METHODS: FISH assay was done on 893 samples of breast cancer. Three scoring methods were evaluated: Her2/CEP17> or =2, Her2>4, or Her2>6. Protein and gene expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (n = 584) and mRNA/assay/nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA; n = 90). RESULTS: Samples were divided into five groups based on FISH results: disomic amplified and nonamplified, polysomic amplified, nonamplified, and discordant (10.8% of cases, mostly positive with Her2>4 scoring, but negative with the others). Her2/CEP17> or =2 and Her2>6 scoring methods showed the best association (a) with regard to FISH scoring (kappa = 0.906, P < 10(-6)) and (b) between FISH and immunohistochemistry (3+ as positive; kappa > 0.650, P < 10(-6)) or NASBA (kappa > 0.536, P < 10(-6)). Polysomy had an effect on Her2 copy number (P < 10(-6)), but had no effect on protein and mRNA content. Therefore, within the discordant subgroup, for which additive Her-2 gene copies are due to high polysomy, protein and mRNA levels were similar to those of the nonamplified samples. For this subgroup, the best concordance between FISH/immunohistochemistry/NASBA was observed with the Her2/CEP17 ratio and Her-2>6 scoring (68% and 58% perfect matches, respectively). No perfect matches were observed using the Her2>4 scoring method. CONCLUSION: Correction for chromosome-17 is the method of choice for clinical practice; Her-2>6, but not Her-2>4, could be used as an alternative.
PURPOSE:Trastuzumab is the cornerstone for treatment of women with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer, both in the adjuvant and in the metastatic settings. The accurate assessment of HER2 is, therefore, critical to identifying patients who may benefit from trastuzumab-based therapy. This project aimed to determine the optimal scoring method for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. METHODS: FISH assay was done on 893 samples of breast cancer. Three scoring methods were evaluated: Her2/CEP17> or =2, Her2>4, or Her2>6. Protein and gene expression were evaluated by immunohistochemistry (n = 584) and mRNA/assay/nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA; n = 90). RESULTS: Samples were divided into five groups based on FISH results: disomic amplified and nonamplified, polysomic amplified, nonamplified, and discordant (10.8% of cases, mostly positive with Her2>4 scoring, but negative with the others). Her2/CEP17> or =2 and Her2>6 scoring methods showed the best association (a) with regard to FISH scoring (kappa = 0.906, P < 10(-6)) and (b) between FISH and immunohistochemistry (3+ as positive; kappa > 0.650, P < 10(-6)) or NASBA (kappa > 0.536, P < 10(-6)). Polysomy had an effect on Her2 copy number (P < 10(-6)), but had no effect on protein and mRNA content. Therefore, within the discordant subgroup, for which additive Her-2 gene copies are due to high polysomy, protein and mRNA levels were similar to those of the nonamplified samples. For this subgroup, the best concordance between FISH/immunohistochemistry/NASBA was observed with the Her2/CEP17 ratio and Her-2>6 scoring (68% and 58% perfect matches, respectively). No perfect matches were observed using the Her2>4 scoring method. CONCLUSION: Correction for chromosome-17 is the method of choice for clinical practice; Her-2>6, but not Her-2>4, could be used as an alternative.
Authors: Meixuan Chen; Mariacarla Andreozzi; Barbara Pockaj; Michael T Barrett; Idris Tolgay Ocal; Ann E McCullough; Maria E Linnaus; James M Chang; Jennifer H Yearley; Lakshmanan Annamalai; Karen S Anderson Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Johan Staaf; Göran Jönsson; Markus Ringnér; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Dorthe Grabau; Adalgeir Arason; Haukur Gunnarsson; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Per-Olof Malmström; Oskar Th Johannsson; Niklas Loman; Rosa B Barkardottir; Ake Borg Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Monica M Reinholz; Amy K Bruzek; Daniel W Visscher; Wilma L Lingle; Matthew J Schroeder; Edith A Perez; Robert B Jenkins Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Amylou C Dueck; Robert B Jenkins; Chungyeul Kim; Beiyun Chen; Ivonne Villalobos; Soonmyung Paik; Marc Buyse; Anne E Wiktor; Reid Meyer; Melanie Finnigan; Joanne Zujewski; Mona Shing; Howard M Stern; Wilma L Lingle; Monica M Reinholz; Dennis J Slamon Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 4.872