Literature DB >> 17040937

Maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle.

D W Beckman1, R M Enns, S E Speidel, B W Brigham, D J Garrick.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to quantify the role of maternal effects on docility in Limousin cattle. Docility scores were obtained at weaning while animals were restrained in a squeeze chute. Scores 1 through 6 represented a docile to aggressive temperament, respectively, and were provided by the North American Limousin Foundation. Observations with unknown age of dam, contemporary groups containing less than 10 observations, contemporary groups with no variation, and single-sire contemporary groups were removed, leaving 21,932 observations. A 2-generation pedigree file compiled from animals with observations contained 49,459 animals. Fixed effects were weaning contemporary group and age of dam (2, > or =3 yr). Six animal models encompassed combinations of random factors: direct genetic, maternal genetic, and maternal permanent environmental effects. The model D was the most basic, containing direct genetic and residual effects, and it resembled the method currently used by the North American Limousin Foundation for genetic evaluation of docility. Maternal genetic or permanent environmental effects were separately added to the model D, denoted as models DM and DC, respectively. Model DMC contained all random factors. Models DM-Zero and DMC-Zero were equivalent to models DM and DMC, respectively, but with zero direct-maternal genetic covariance. Direct heritability estimates were moderate for all models (0.29 +/- 0.02 to 0.38 +/- 0.03). Maternal heritability estimates were low, ranging from 0.01 +/- 0.01 (DM-Zero) to 0.05 +/- 0.02 (DM). Negative direct-maternal genetic correlations of -0.41 +/- 0.09 and -0.55 +/- 0.09 were estimated for models DM and DMC, respectively. The proportion of phenotypic variance accounted for by maternal permanent environmental effects was 0.03 +/- 0.01, 0.04 +/- 0.01, and 0.02 +/- 0.01 for models DC, DMC, and DMC-Zero, respectively. Likelihood ratio tests indicated that model DMC best fit the data. Although maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects were significant, they accounted for only 8% (model DMC) of the phenotypic variance, and a Spearman rank correlation of 0.99 between models D and DMC showed sires did not rank differently with or without inclusion of these effects. Given these results, inclusion of maternal effects to the genetic evaluation of docility in Limousin cattle does not seem warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17040937     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Repeatability and heritability of behavioural types in a social cichlid.

Authors:  Noémie Chervet; Markus Zöttl; Roger Schürch; Michael Taborsky; Dik Heg
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-05-04

Review 2.  Genetic selection for temperament traits in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  Marie J Haskell; Geoff Simm; Simon P Turner
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Deciphering Cattle Temperament Measures Derived From a Four-Platform Standing Scale Using Genetic Factor Analytic Modeling.

Authors:  Haipeng Yu; Gota Morota; Elfren F Celestino; Carl R Dahlen; Sarah A Wagner; David G Riley; Lauren L Hulsman Hanna
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Genetic Modeling and Genomic Analyses of Yearling Temperament in American Angus Cattle and Its Relationship With Productive Efficiency and Resilience Traits.

Authors:  Amanda B Alvarenga; Hinayah R Oliveira; Stephen P Miller; Fabyano F Silva; Luiz F Brito
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  Behavioural Traits in Bos taurus Cattle, Their Heritability, Potential Genetic Markers, and Associations with Production Traits.

Authors:  Frances Margaret Titterington; Rachel Knox; Steven James Morrison; Masoud Shirali
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.231

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.