Literature DB >> 17040920

Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures.

Noga Kowalsman1, Miriam Eisenstein.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: The limited success rate of protein-protein docking procedures is generally attributed to structure differences between the bound and unbound states of the molecules. Herein we analyze a large dataset of protein-protein docking results and identify additional parameters that affect the performance of docking procedures.
RESULTS: We find that the distinction between nearly correct models (NCMs) and decoys depends on the size of the interface to be predicted thus setting a limit to the prediction ability of docking procedures, particularly those in which the geometric complementarity descriptor is dominant. The geometric complementarity score in grid-based docking carries a large statistical error which further reduces the distinction between NCMs and decoys. We propose a method for correcting the statistical error and show that the distinction is improved when the docking models are ranked by statistically equivalent scores. AVAILABILITY: MolFit can be downloaded from our website http://www.weizmann.ac.il/Chemical_Research_Support/molfit. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17040920     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  12 in total

1.  Surface-histogram: a new shape descriptor for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Shengyin Gu; Patrice Koehl; Joel Hass; Nina Amenta
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-11-09

Review 2.  Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Molecular Mechanisms and Kinetic Effects of FXYD1 and Phosphomimetic Mutants on Purified Human Na,K-ATPase.

Authors:  Neeraj Kumar Mishra; Michael Habeck; Corinna Kirchner; Haim Haviv; Yoav Peleg; Miriam Eisenstein; Hans Juergen Apell; Steven J D Karlish
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Targeting TLR4 signaling by TLR4 Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-derived decoy peptides: identification of the TLR4 Toll/IL-1 receptor domain dimerization interface.

Authors:  Vladimir Y Toshchakov; Henryk Szmacinski; Leah A Couture; Joseph R Lakowicz; Stefanie N Vogel
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Refining near-native protein-protein docking decoys by local resampling and energy minimization.

Authors:  Shide Liang; Guangce Wang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-08-01

6.  A unique spatial arrangement of the snRNPs within the native spliceosome emerges from in silico studies.

Authors:  Ziv Frankenstein; Joseph Sperling; Ruth Sperling; Miriam Eisenstein
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 7.  On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact.

Authors:  Panagiotis L Kastritis; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  A simple reference state makes a significant improvement in near-native selections from structurally refined docking decoys.

Authors:  Shide Liang; Song Liu; Chi Zhang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-11-01

9.  Pushing structural information into the yeast interactome by high-throughput protein docking experiments.

Authors:  Roberto Mosca; Carles Pons; Juan Fernández-Recio; Patrick Aloy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Structural assembly of two-domain proteins by rigid-body docking.

Authors:  Tammy M K Cheng; Tom L Blundell; Juan Fernandez-Recio
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.