Literature DB >> 17039769

Differences in responses from the cochleae and central nervous systems of females with low versus high acceptable noise levels.

Ashley W Harkrider1, Joanna W Tampas.   

Abstract

Studies of acceptable noise level (ANL) consistently report large intersubject variability in acceptance of background noise while listening to speech. This variability is not related to age, gender, hearing sensitivity, type of background noise, speech perception in noise performance, or efferent activity of the medial olivocochlear pathway. An exploratory study was conducted to determine if differences in aggregate responses from the peripheral and central auditory system can account for intersubject variability in ANL. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs), binaural auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), and middle latency responses (MLRs) were measured in females with normal hearing with low (n = 6) versus high (n = 7) ANLs. Results of this preliminary study indicate no differences between the groups for CEOAEs or waves I or III of the ABR. Differences between the two groups emerge for the amplitudes of wave V of the ABR and for the Na-Pa component of the MLR, suggesting that physiological variations arising from more central regions of the auditory system may mediate background noise acceptance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17039769     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  8 in total

1.  Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.

Authors:  L M Friesen; K L Tremblay; N Rohila; R A Wright; R V Shannon; D Başkent; J T Rubinstein
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Influence of Acoustic Overstimulation on the Central Auditory System: An Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Study.

Authors:  Tomasz Wolak; Katarzyna Cieśla; Mateusz Rusiniak; Adam Piłka; Monika Lewandowska; Agnieszka Pluta; Henryk Skarżyński; Piotr H Skarżyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-11-28

3.  Effect of systematic desensitization training on acceptable noise levels in adults with normal hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Arivudainambi Pitchaimuthu; Anshul Arora; Jayashree S Bhat; Vibha Kanagokar
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

4.  Top-Down Auditory Plasticity: Acceptable Noise Level Predicts and Reflects the Effect of Perceptual Learning in Experience-Induced Plasticity.

Authors:  Elahe Ravanshenas; Hamid Jalilvand; Alireza Akbarzade Baghban
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2019

5.  The Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and Electrophysiologic Auditory Brainstem and Cortical Signal to Noise Ratios.

Authors:  Hemanth N Shetty; Sankalapa Mahadev; Devamma Veeresh
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-05-20

6.  Comparison of Acceptable Noise Level Generated Using Different Transducers and Response Modes.

Authors:  Liang Xia; Jingchun He; Yuanyuan Sun; Yi Chen; Qiong Luo; Haibo Shi; Yanmei Feng; Shankai Yin
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 7.  Acceptable noise level as a deciding factor for prescribing hearing aids for older adults with cochlear hearing loss - A scoping review.

Authors:  Hemanth Narayan Shetty; Swathi Subbanna
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2015-11-11

8.  Encoding of speech sounds at auditory brainstem level in good and poor hearing aid performers.

Authors:  Hemanth Narayan Shetty; Manjula Puttabasappa
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.