Literature DB >> 17039765

Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use.

Anna K Nabelek1, Melinda C Freyaldenhoven, Joanna W Tampas, Samuel B Burchfiel, Robert A Muenchen.   

Abstract

Acceptable noise level (ANL) measures a listener's reaction to background noise while listening to speech. Relations among hearing aid use and ANL, speech in noise (SPIN) scores, and listener characteristics (age, gender, pure-tone average) were investigated in 191 listeners with hearing impairment. Listeners were assigned to one of three groups based on patterns of hearing aid use: full-time use (whenever hearing aids are needed), part-time use (occasional use), or nonuse. Results showed that SPIN scores and listener characteristics were not related to ANL or hearing aid use. However, ANLs were related to hearing aid use. Specifically, full-time hearing aid users accepted more background noise than part-time users or nonusers, yet part-time users and nonusers could not be differentiated. Thus, a prediction of hearing aid use was examined by comparing part-time users and nonusers (unsuccessful hearing aid users) with full-time users (successful hearing aid users). Regression analysis determined that unaided ANLs could predict a listener's success of hearing aids with 85% accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17039765     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  24 in total

1.  Measurement of hearing aid internal noise.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Shawn S Goodman; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.

Authors:  H Gustav Mueller; Jennifer Weber; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

3.  Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.

Authors:  Melinda C Anderson; Kathryn H Arehart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Predicting three-month and 12-month post-fitting real-world hearing-aid outcome using pre-fitting acceptable noise level (ANL).

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Hsu-Chueh Ho; Shih-Hsuan Hsiao; Ryan B Brummet; Octav Chipara
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds.

Authors:  Catherine V Palmer; Ruth Bentler; H Gustav Mueller
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-06

6.  Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice Low, Medium, and High.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Christine Brenner; Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-05-15

7.  Effect of minimal hearing loss on children's ability to multitask in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Brittany McFadden; Andrea Pittman
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Advantages of binaural amplification to acceptable noise level of directional hearing aid users.

Authors:  Ja-Hee Kim; Jae Hee Lee; Ho-Ki Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.372

9.  Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Subjective criteria underlying noise-tolerance in the presence of speech.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Nahae Kayden Kim; Stephanie A Lockshaw; Megan N Nash
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.