Literature DB >> 17039293

Advance directives: prerequisites and usefulness.

D van Asselt1.   

Abstract

Advance directives allow competent persons to extend their right of self-determination into the future, by recording choices that are intended to influence their future care should they become unable to make choices. They are considered tools to facilitate end-of-life decision making. Advance directives are a form of anticipatory decision-making. This article will focus on instruction directives against a certain treatment, so-called advance refusals. The most important legal requirement is the acknowledgement of patient autonomy. This condition is met in all European countries. The legal uncertainties surrounding advance refusals are focused on practical modalities rather than on the validity of the general principle. According to leading ethics the underlying moral rule of advanced directives is that all truly autonomous refusals of treatment must be respected, no matter what the consequences. Physicians find it hard to adhere to the wishes and choices of patients as expressed in directives. They find the text ambiguous. Another weakness is that directives give little information about what in the patient's view constitutes a good quality of life. Some health professionals lack the willingness to step outside their own value systems and fully embrace that of the patient. Empathic skills are required. Very few persons create an advance directive. Furthermore, of the created directives only some are accessible when patients are admitted to hospital. However, when directives are available they usually influence medical treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17039293     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-006-0373-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  15 in total

1.  Public uses Denmark's living will.

Authors:  Margaret Dolley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-02-13

Review 2.  [Advance directives in Europe].

Authors:  Heinz Barta; Gertrud Kalchschmid
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  The values history: an innovation in surrogate medical decision-making.

Authors:  P Lambert; J M Gibson; P Nathanson
Journal:  Law Med Health Care       Date:  1990

4.  Advance care planning in nursing homes: pre- and post-Patient Self-Determination Act.

Authors:  N G Castle; V Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care.

Authors:  M Danis; L I Southerland; J M Garrett; J L Smith; F Hielema; C G Pickard; D M Egner; D L Patrick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end of life.

Authors:  James A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  Eric B Larson; Xin Yao
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: convention on human rights and biomedicine (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 November 1996). Council of Europe Convention of Biomedicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Stability of choices about life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  M Danis; J Garrett; R Harris; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The inaccessibility of advance directives on transfer from ambulatory to acute care settings.

Authors:  R S Morrison; E Olson; K R Mertz; D E Meier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.