Literature DB >> 17039265

Predicting response to primary chemotherapy: gene expression profiling of paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue.

Lida Mina1, Sharon E Soule, Sunil Badve, Fredrick L Baehner, Joffre Baker, Maureen Cronin, Drew Watson, Mei-Lan Liu, George W Sledge, Steve Shak, Kathy D Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Primary chemotherapy provides an ideal opportunity to correlate gene expression with response to treatment. We used paraffin-embedded core biopsies from a completed phase II trial to identify genes that correlate with response to primary chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage II or III breast cancer were treated with sequential doxorubicin 75 mg/M2 q2 wks x 3 and docetaxel 40 mg/M2 weekly x 6; treatment order was randomly assigned. Pretreatment core biopsy samples were interrogated for genes that might correlate with pathologic complete response (pCR). In addition to the individual genes, the correlation of the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score with pCR was examined.
RESULTS: Of 70 patients enrolled in the parent trial, core biopsies samples with sufficient RNA for gene analyses were available from 45 patients; 9 (20%) had inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Six (14%) patients achieved a pCR. Twenty-two of the 274 candidate genes assessed correlated with pCR (p < 0.05). Genes correlating with pCR could be grouped into three large clusters: angiogenesis-related genes, proliferation related genes, and invasion-related genes. Expression of estrogen receptor (ER)-related genes and Recurrence Score did not correlate with pCR. In an exploratory analysis we compared gene expression in IBC to non-inflammatory breast cancer; twenty-four (9%) of the genes were differentially expressed (p < 0.05), 5 were upregulated and 19 were downregulated in IBC.
CONCLUSION: Gene expression analysis on core biopsy samples is feasible and identifies candidate genes that correlate with pCR to primary chemotherapy. Gene expression in IBC differs significantly from noninflammatory breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17039265     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9366-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  20 in total

1.  Can dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) predict tumor recurrence and lymph node status in patients with breast cancer?

Authors:  S Bahri; J-H Chen; H J Yu; A Kuzucan; O Nalcioglu; M-Y Su
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Patients' perceptions of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Y Bombard; L Rozmovits; M E Trudeau; N B Leighl; K Deal; D A Marshall
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Quantitative nuclear histomorphometry predicts oncotype DX risk categories for early stage ER+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Jon Whitney; German Corredor; Andrew Janowczyk; Shridar Ganesan; Scott Doyle; John Tomaszewski; Michael Feldman; Hannah Gilmore; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Early developments in gene-expression profiling of breast tumors: potential for increasing black-white patient disparities in breast cancer outcomes?

Authors:  Donna H Odierna; Aimee Afable-Munsuz; Ogechi Ikediobi; Mary Beattie; Sara Knight; Michelle Ko; Adrienne Wilson; Ninez A Ponce
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Loss of heterozygosity predicts poor survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jan Franko; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Marina N Nikiforova; Narcis O Zarnescu; Kenneth K W Lee; Steven J Hughes; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; A James Moser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Gene expression profiling for guiding adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in women with early breast cancer: an evidence-based and economic analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-12-01

Review 7.  Genomic predictors of outcome and treatment response in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lara Dunn; Angela Demichele
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.074

8.  Reliable PCR quantitation of estrogen, progesterone and ERBB2 receptor mRNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue is independent of prior macro-dissection.

Authors:  Trine Tramm; Guido Hennig; Marianne Kyndi; Jan Alsner; Flemming Brandt Sørensen; Simen Myhre; Therese Sørlie; Jens Overgaard
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Access to personalized medicine: factors influencing the use and value of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Y Bombard; L Rozmovits; M Trudeau; N B Leighl; K Deal; D A Marshall
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Barriers to the use of personalized medicine in breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine B Weldon; Julia R Trosman; William J Gradishar; Al B Benson; Julian C Schink
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.