Literature DB >> 17038880

A retrospective TDM database analysis of interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir in HIV-infected adults.

Martijn R van der Leur1, David M Burger, Charles J L la Porte, Peter P Koopmans.   

Abstract

Lopinavir is one of the most-widely used protease inhibitors in the treatment of HIV-1 infected patients. Concentration-effect relationships have been described for both antiviral activity and toxicity. Less is known about patient characteristics that may determine interpatient variability in lopinavir plasma concentrations. A database was created containing all Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) results collected at our Department. Patients were included if they were using lopinavir twice daily for at least two weeks; subjects who were known to be nonadherent (based on either a lopinavir concentration <0.2 mg/L or suspected by the physician) were excluded. Demographic data were collected from TDM application forms and patient charts. Patients attending one of the 22 HIV treatment centers in The Netherlands. The Department of Clinical Pharmacy is a national referral center for TDM of antiretroviral agents. Lopinavir concentration ratios (CRs) were calculated for each patient by dividing the individual plasma concentration by the time-adjusted population value. Relationships with lopinavir CRs were tested using regression analysis and analysis of variance. A total of 802 patients were included (607 males; 150 females; 45 unknown). The age and body weight of the patients ranged from 18 to 74 years (mean 42) and 42 to 121 kg (mean 72), respectively. Race was known for 756 persons: Caucasian 76%, African 18% and Asian 6%. The median (+ interquartile range, IQR) lopinavir CR was 0.98 (IQR: 0.67-1.31). Body weight showed an inverse relationship with lopinavir CR (F = 23.1; P < 0.001). Age was not related with lopinavir CR (P = 0.99). Female patients had a significantly higher lopinavir CR than males: 1.18 vs. 1.03 (P = 0.005); race was not associated with differences in lopinavir CR. In a multivariate regression analysis body weight, but not gender, remained significantly related to lopinavir CR. Body weight is the only demographic factor that could be related to lopinavir exposure; clinicians should be alert for an increased risk of suboptimal antiviral efficacy in patients with high body weight, and for an increased risk of toxicity in patients with a low body weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17038880     DOI: 10.1097/01.ftd.0000245681.12092.d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  16 in total

1.  CYP3A4 polymorphism and lopinavir toxicity in an HIV-infected pregnant woman.

Authors:  Elena López Aspiroz; Salvador Enrique Cabrera Figueroa; Alicia Iglesias Gómez; María Paz Valverde Merino; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil Hurlé
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Pharmacokinetics and virologic response of zidovudine/lopinavir/ritonavir initiated during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Tim R Cressey; Gonzague Jourdain; Boonsong Rawangban; Supang Varadisai; Rucha Kongpanichkul; Prapan Sabsanong; Prapap Yuthavisuthi; Somnuk Chirayus; Nicole Ngo-Giang-Huong; Nipunporn Voramongkol; Somsak Pattarakulwanich; Marc Lallemant
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing the pharmacokinetics of standard- and increased-dosage lopinavir-ritonavir coformulation tablets in HIV-positive pregnant women.

Authors:  Marilia Santini-Oliveira; Rita de Cássia Elias Estrela; Valdiléa Gonçalves Veloso; Vitória Berg Cattani; Carolyn Yanavich; Luciane Velasque; Thiago Silva Torres; Luana Monteiro Spindola Marins; José Henrique Pilotto; Esaú Custódio João; José Carlos Saraiva Gonçalves; Beatriz Grinsztejn
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Sex differences in lopinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics among HIV-infected women and men.

Authors:  Obi C Umeh; Judith S Currier; Jeong-Gun Park; Yoninah Cramer; Ashwaq E Hermes; Courtney V Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  Individualized Protease Inhibitor Monotherapy: The Role of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenetics in an Aged and Heavily Treated HIV-Infected Patient.

Authors:  Elena López Aspiroz; Salvador Enrique Cabrera Figueroa; María Paz Valverde Merino; Ángel Carracedo Álvarez
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Age-related changes in plasma concentrations of the HIV protease inhibitor lopinavir.

Authors:  Keith W Crawford; John Spritzler; Robert C Kalayjian; Teresa Parsons; Alan Landay; Richard Pollard; Vicki Stocker; Michael M Lederman; Charles Flexner
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.205

7.  Early postpartum pharmacokinetics of lopinavir initiated intrapartum in Thai women.

Authors:  Tim R Cressey; Russell Van Dyke; Gonzague Jourdain; Thanyawee Puthanakit; Anuvat Roongpisuthipong; Jullapong Achalapong; Prapap Yuthavisuthi; Sinart Prommas; Nantasak Chotivanich; Robert Maupin; Elizabeth Smith; David E Shapiro; Mark Mirochnick
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Simultaneous population pharmacokinetic model for lopinavir and ritonavir in HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  José Moltó; Manuel José Barbanoj; Cristina Miranda; Asunción Blanco; José Ramón Santos; Eugenia Negredo; Joan Costa; Pere Domingo; Bonaventura Clotet; Marta Valle
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in pregnant women.

Authors:  Matthieu Roustit; Malik Jlaiel; Pascale Leclercq; Françoise Stanke-Labesque
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Factors influencing lopinavir and atazanavir plasma concentration.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stöhr; David Back; David Dunn; Caroline Sabin; Alan Winston; Richard Gilson; Deenan Pillay; Teresa Hill; Jonathan Ainsworth; Brian Gazzard; Clifford Leen; Loveleen Bansi; Martin Fisher; Chloe Orkin; Jane Anderson; Margaret Johnson; Philippa Easterbrook; Sara Gibbons; Saye Khoo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.