Literature DB >> 17036430

A living will clause for supporters of animal experimentation.

David Sztybel1.   

Abstract

Many people assume that invasive research on animals is justified because of its supposed benefits and because of the supposed mental inferiority of animals. However probably most people would be unwilling to sign a living will which consigns themselves to live biomedical experimentation if they ever, through misfortune, end up with a mental capacity equivalent to a laboratory animal. The benefits would be greater by far for medical science if living will signatories were to be used, and also the mental superiority boast would no longer apply. Ultimately, it is argued that invasive biomedical experiments would be unacceptable in a democratic society whose members are philosophically self-consistent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17036430     DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00338.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Philos        ISSN: 0264-3758


  3 in total

1.  The ethics of animal research: a survey of pediatric health care workers.

Authors:  Ari R Joffe; Meredith Bara; Natalie Anton; Nathan Nobis
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.464

Review 2.  Justifiability and Animal Research in Health: Can Democratisation Help Resolve Difficulties?

Authors:  Shaun Yon-Seng Khoo
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  The ethics of animal research: a survey of the public and scientists in North America.

Authors:  Ari R Joffe; Meredith Bara; Natalie Anton; Nathan Nobis
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.