BACKGROUND: Many biological and chemical agents have the capacity to alter the way the immune system functions in human and animals. This study evaluates the immunotoxicity of 20 substances used widely in work environments. METHODS: A systematic literature search on the immunotoxicity of 20 chemicals was performed. The first step was to review literature on immunotoxicity testing and testing schemes adopted for establishing immunotoxicity in humans. The second step consisted of providing a documentation on immunotoxicity of substances that are widely used in work environment, by building tables for each chemical of interest (benzene, trichloroethylene, PAHs, crystalline silica, diesel exhausts, welding fumes, asbestos, styrene, formaldehyde, toluene, vinyl chloride monomer, tetrachloroethylene, chlorophenols, 1,3-butadiene, mineral oils, P-dichlorobenzene, dichloromethane, xylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, ethylene oxide). The third step was the classification of substances; an index (strong, intermediate, weak, nil) was assigned on the basis of the evidence of toxicity and type of immunotoxic effects (immunosuppression, autoimmunity, hypersensitivity) on the basis of the immune responses. Finally substances were assigned a score of immunotoxic power. RESULTS: Tables have been produced that include information for the 20 substances of interest, based on 227 animal studies and 94 human studies. Each substance was assigned an index of immunotoxic evidence, a score of immunotoxic power and type of immunotoxic effect. CONCLUSIONS: This matrix can represent a tool to identify chemicals with similar properties concerning the toxicity for the immune system, and to interpret epidemiological studies on immune-related diseases.
BACKGROUND: Many biological and chemical agents have the capacity to alter the way the immune system functions in human and animals. This study evaluates the immunotoxicity of 20 substances used widely in work environments. METHODS: A systematic literature search on the immunotoxicity of 20 chemicals was performed. The first step was to review literature on immunotoxicity testing and testing schemes adopted for establishing immunotoxicity in humans. The second step consisted of providing a documentation on immunotoxicity of substances that are widely used in work environment, by building tables for each chemical of interest (benzene, trichloroethylene, PAHs, crystalline silica, diesel exhausts, welding fumes, asbestos, styrene, formaldehyde, toluene, vinyl chloride monomer, tetrachloroethylene, chlorophenols, 1,3-butadiene, mineral oils, P-dichlorobenzene, dichloromethane, xylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, ethylene oxide). The third step was the classification of substances; an index (strong, intermediate, weak, nil) was assigned on the basis of the evidence of toxicity and type of immunotoxic effects (immunosuppression, autoimmunity, hypersensitivity) on the basis of the immune responses. Finally substances were assigned a score of immunotoxic power. RESULTS: Tables have been produced that include information for the 20 substances of interest, based on 227 animal studies and 94 human studies. Each substance was assigned an index of immunotoxic evidence, a score of immunotoxic power and type of immunotoxic effect. CONCLUSIONS: This matrix can represent a tool to identify chemicals with similar properties concerning the toxicity for the immune system, and to interpret epidemiological studies on immune-related diseases.
Authors: Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Matthew M Dahm; Christine A Toennis; Deborah L Sammons; Tracy Eye; Vamsi Kodali; Patti C Zeidler-Erdely; Aaron Erdely Journal: Nanotoxicology Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 5.913
Authors: Colleen T O'Dell; Lisbeth A Boule; Jacques Robert; Steve N Georas; Sophia Eliseeva; B Paige Lawrence Journal: J Immunotoxicol Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Xiao Zhang; Andrew D Wallace; Pan Du; Warren A Kibbe; Nadereh Jafari; Hehuang Xie; Simon Lin; Andrea Baccarelli; Marcelo Bento Soares; Lifang Hou Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: Stacey E Anderson; Jennifer Franko; Katie L Anderson; Albert E Munson; Ewa Lukomska; B Jean Meade Journal: J Immunotoxicol Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Lisbeth A Boulé; Timothy J Chapman; Sara E Hillman; Christopher D Kassotis; Colleen O'Dell; Jacques Robert; Steve N Georas; Susan C Nagel; B Paige Lawrence Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Caroline Besson; Amy Moore; Wenting Wu; Claire M Vajdic; Silvia de Sanjose; Nicola J Camp; Karin E Smedby; Tait D Shanafelt; Lindsay M Morton; Jerry D Brewer; Lydia Zablotska; Eric A Engels; James R Cerhan; Susan L Slager; Jiali Han; Sonja I Berndt Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Jacques Robert; Connor C McGuire; Fayth Kim; Susan C Nagel; Stephen J Price; B Paige Lawrence; Francisco De Jesús Andino Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 4.849