Literature DB >> 17035723

Influence of applied quantity of sunscreen products on the sun protection factor--a multicenter study organized by the DGK Task Force Sun Protection.

R Bimczok1, H Gers-Barlag, C Mundt, E Klette, S Bielfeldt, T Rudolph, F Pflucker, U Heinrich, H Tronnier, W Johncock, B Klebon, H Westenfelder, H Flosser-Muller, K Jenni, D Kockott, J Lademann, B Herzog, M Rohr.   

Abstract

It is often debated that the protection against solar-induced erythema under real conditions is dependent upon the amount of sunscreen applied. It is believed that when too little is applied a lower sun protection than indicated on the label will result. The aim of this study was to quantify this effect. In this multicenter study, the influence of three different amounts (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/cm(2)) of three commercial sunscreen products in three reliable test centers was investigated according to the test protocol of The International Sun Protection Factor Test Method. The main result was a linear dependence of the SPF on the quantity applied. Taking into consideration the volunteer-specific variations, an exponential dependence of confidence interval of the in vivo SPF and amount applied was found. The highest amount applied (2.0 mg/cm(2)) was linked to the lowest confidence intervals. Thus, from the point of view of producing reliable and reproducible in vivo results under laboratory conditions, the recommendation of this multicenter study is an application quantity of 2.0 mg/cm(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17035723     DOI: 10.1159/000096173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Pharmacol Physiol        ISSN: 1660-5527            Impact factor:   3.479


  8 in total

Review 1.  [How safe are nanoparticles?].

Authors:  J Lademann; M Meinke; W Sterry; A Patzelt
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  [Sun protection factor 50+ : Pro and contra].

Authors:  T Herzinger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  [Prevention of occupational solar UV radiation-induced epithelial skin cancer].

Authors:  A Bauer; S Beissert; P Knuschke
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Sunscreen Use and Melanoma Risk Among Young Australian Adults.

Authors:  Caroline G Watts; Martin Drummond; Chris Goumas; Helen Schmid; Bruce K Armstrong; Joanne F Aitken; Mark A Jenkins; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Graham J Mann; Anne E Cust
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 5.  Sun protection for preventing basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers.

Authors:  Guillermo Sánchez; John Nova; Andrea Esperanza Rodriguez-Hernandez; Roger David Medina; Carolina Solorzano-Restrepo; Jenny Gonzalez; Miguel Olmos; Kathie Godfrey; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-25

6.  [Modern light protection from the view of occupational dermatology].

Authors:  H F Merk; J Baratli
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  New methods for assessing secondary performance attributes of sunscreens suitable for professional outdoor work.

Authors:  Marc Rocholl; Patricia Weinert; Stephan Bielfeldt; Sabrina Laing; Klaus Peter Wilhelm; Claas Ulrich; Swen Malte John
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 2.646

8.  Outdoor sunscreen testing with high-intensity solar exposure in a Chinese and Caucasian population.

Authors:  Corinne Granger; Gavin Ong; Philippe Andres; Carles Trullàs; Muzzammil Hosenally; Wei Lai; Wei Liu; Jean Krutmann; Thierry Passeron; Henry W Lim
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.254

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.