Literature DB >> 17034303

Comparison of SPECT aerosol deposition data with a human respiratory tract model.

John S Fleming1, Ben P Epps, Joy H Conway, Ted B Martonen.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) radionuclide imaging provides detailed information on the distribution of inhaled aerosol material within the body. Analysis of the data can provide estimates of the deposition per airway generation. In this study, two different nebulizers have been used to deliver radiolabeled aerosols of different particle size to 12 human subjects. Medical imaging has been used to assess the deposition in the body. The deposition pattern has also been estimated using the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) empirical model and compared to values obtained by experiment. The results showed generally good agreement between model and experiment for both aerosols for the deposition in the extrathoracic and conducting airways. However, there were significant differences in the fate of the remainder of the aerosol between the amount deposited in the alveolar region and that exhaled. The inter-subject variability of deposition predicted by the model was significantly less than that measured, for all regions of the body. The model predicted quite well the differences in deposition distribution pattern between the two aerosols. In conclusion, this study has shown that the ICPR model of inhaled aerosol deposition shows areas of good agreement with results from experiment. However, there are also areas of disagreement, which may be explained by hygroscopic particle growth and individual variation in airway anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17034303     DOI: 10.1089/jam.2006.19.268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med        ISSN: 0894-2684


  9 in total

1.  The use of combined single photon emission computed tomography and X-ray computed tomography to assess the fate of inhaled aerosol.

Authors:  John Fleming; Joy Conway; Caroline Majoral; Livia Tossici-Bolt; Ira Katz; Georges Caillibotte; Diane Perchet; Marine Pichelin; Bernhard Muellinger; Ted Martonen; Philipp Kroneberg; Gabriela Apiou-Sbirlea
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 2.849

2.  Analysis of three-dimensional aerosol deposition in pharmacologically relevant terms: beyond black or white ROIs.

Authors:  Elliot Eliyahu Greenblatt; Tilo Winkler; Robert Scott Harris; Vanessa Jane Kelly; Mamary Kone; Jose Venegas
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.849

3.  Validating Whole-Airway CFD Predictions of DPI Aerosol Deposition at Multiple Flow Rates.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Geng Tian; Navvab Khajeh-Hosseini-Dalasm; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.849

Review 4.  In silico models of aerosol delivery to the respiratory tract - development and applications.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Landon T Holbrook
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 5.  Use of computational fluid dynamics deposition modeling in respiratory drug delivery.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Karl Bass; Rabijit Dutta; Vijaya Rani; Morgan L Thomas; Ahmad El-Achwah; Michael Hindle
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.648

6.  Validating CFD Predictions of Pharmaceutical Aerosol Deposition with In Vivo Data.

Authors:  Geng Tian; Michael Hindle; Sau Lee; P Worth Longest
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Current Inhalers Deliver Very Small Doses to the Lower Tracheobronchial Airways: Assessment of Healthy and Constricted Lungs.

Authors:  Ross L Walenga; P Worth Longest
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  Assessment of the predictive capability of modelling and simulation to determine bioequivalence of inhaled drugs: A systematic review.

Authors:  Juliet Rebello; Bill Brashier; Sharvari Shukla
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.088

9.  Humidified and Heated Cascade Impactor for Aerosol Sizing.

Authors:  Caroline Majoral; Allan L Coates; Alain Le Pape; Laurent Vecellio
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.