Sarah R Baker1, Caroline L Pankhurst, Peter G Robinson. 1. Department of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. s.r.baker@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to systematically test Wilson and Cleary's [Wilson IB, Cleary PD. JAMA 1995; 273: 59-65] conceptual model of the direct and mediated pathways between clinical and non-clinical variables in relation to the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with xerostomia. METHODS: We collected measures of clinical variables, self-reported symptoms, OHRQoL, global oral health perceptions and subjective well-being from 85 patients attending outpatient clinics. RESULTS: Structural equation modelling indicated support for the dominant direct pathways between the main levels of the model; more severe clinical signs predicted worse patient reported symptoms; worse symptom perception was associated with a lower functional status as measured by OHRQoL; and lower OHRQoL predicted worse global oral health perceptions. There was no relationship between the final two levels of the model; global oral health perceptions and subjective well-being. Subjective well-being was associated instead with earlier non-adjacent levels; biological variables, symptoms and functional status. These pathways were both direct (salivary flow-well-being, functioning-well-being) and indirect (clinical signs-well being, symptom status-well-being). There were also indirect pathways; most notably, the impact of clinical variables on OHRQoL was mediated by patient reported symptom status. CONCLUSIONS: The results support Wilson and Cleary's conceptual model of patient outcomes as applied to a chronic oral health condition and highlight the complexity of (inter)relationships between key clinical and non-clinical variables. Further conceptual development of the model is discussed, particularly the role of individual difference factors, and theoretical and methodological issues in OHRQoL research are highlighted.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to systematically test Wilson and Cleary's [Wilson IB, Cleary PD. JAMA 1995; 273: 59-65] conceptual model of the direct and mediated pathways between clinical and non-clinical variables in relation to the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of patients with xerostomia. METHODS: We collected measures of clinical variables, self-reported symptoms, OHRQoL, global oral health perceptions and subjective well-being from 85 patients attending outpatient clinics. RESULTS: Structural equation modelling indicated support for the dominant direct pathways between the main levels of the model; more severe clinical signs predicted worse patient reported symptoms; worse symptom perception was associated with a lower functional status as measured by OHRQoL; and lower OHRQoL predicted worse global oral health perceptions. There was no relationship between the final two levels of the model; global oral health perceptions and subjective well-being. Subjective well-being was associated instead with earlier non-adjacent levels; biological variables, symptoms and functional status. These pathways were both direct (salivary flow-well-being, functioning-well-being) and indirect (clinical signs-well being, symptom status-well-being). There were also indirect pathways; most notably, the impact of clinical variables on OHRQoL was mediated by patient reported symptom status. CONCLUSIONS: The results support Wilson and Cleary's conceptual model of patient outcomes as applied to a chronic oral health condition and highlight the complexity of (inter)relationships between key clinical and non-clinical variables. Further conceptual development of the model is discussed, particularly the role of individual difference factors, and theoretical and methodological issues in OHRQoL research are highlighted.
Authors: John P Bentley; Cynthia J Brown; Gerald McGwin; Patricia Sawyer; Richard M Allman; David L Roth Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2012-11-17 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nancy E Mayo; Susan C Scott; Mark Bayley; Angela Cheung; Jayne Garland; Jeffrey Jutai; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Ramony Chan; Robert Brooks; Jonathan Erlich; Martin Gallagher; Paul Snelling; Josephine Chow; Michael Suranyi Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Kevin C Heslin; Judith A Stein; Keith G Heinzerling; Deyu Pan; Christine Magladry; Ron D Hays Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Tamilyn Bakas; Susan M McLennon; Janet S Carpenter; Janice M Buelow; Julie L Otte; Kathleen M Hanna; Marsha L Ellett; Kimberly A Hadler; Janet L Welch Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 3.186