Literature DB >> 17032901

Impact of adjuvant therapy and mammography on U.S. mortality from 1975 to 2000: comparison of mortality results from the cisnet breast cancer base case analysis.

Kathleen A Cronin1, Eric J Feuer, Lauren D Clarke, Sylvia K Plevritis.   

Abstract

The CISNET breast cancer program is a consortium of seven research groups modeling the impact of various cancer interventions on the national trends of breast cancer incidence and mortality. Each of the modeling groups participated in a CISNET breast cancer base case analysis with the objective of assessing the impact of mammography and adjuvant therapy on breast cancer mortality between 1975 and 2000. The comparative modeling approach used to address this question allowed for a unique view into the process of modeling. Results shown here expand on those recently reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (Berry et al., N Engl J Med 2005;353:1784-92) by presenting mortality impact in several different ways to facilitate comparisons between models. Comparisons of each group's results in the context of modeling assumptions made during the process gave insight into how specific model assumptions may have affected the results. The median estimate for the percent decline in breast cancer mortality due to mammography was 15% (range of 8%-23%), and the median estimate for the percent decline in mortality due to adjuvant treatment was 19% (range of 12%-21%). A detailed discussion of the differences in modeling approaches and how those differences may have influenced the mortality results concludes the chapter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032901     DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgj015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  20 in total

1.  Multilevel intervention research: lessons learned and pathways forward.

Authors:  Steven B Clauser; Stephen H Taplin; Mary K Foster; Pebbles Fagan; Arnold D Kaluzny
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  Simulation models of obesity: a review of the literature and implications for research and policy.

Authors:  D T Levy; P L Mabry; Y C Wang; S Gortmaker; T T-K Huang; T Marsh; M Moodie; B Swinburn
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 9.213

3.  Modeling the impact of population screening on breast cancer mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kathleen A Cronin; Donald A Berry; Yaojen Chang; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee; Sylvia K Plevritis; Clyde B Schechter; Natasha K Stout; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Marvin Zelen; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Comparative effectiveness of incorporating a hypothetical DCIS prognostic marker into breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Oguzhan Alagoz; Natasha K Stout; Ronald E Gangnon; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Pamela M Vacek; Sally D Herschorn; Elizabeth S Burnside; Anna N A Tosteson; Donald L Weaver; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Impact of a National Cancer Prevention and Treatment Program on the Prevalence of Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnoses in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Amanda Janitz; Aaron M Wendelboe; Ann F Chou; Summer Frank; Angela Watkins; David Thompson; Janis Campbell
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

6.  Coping Among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Brief COPE.

Authors:  Kevin L Rand; Andrea A Cohee; Patrick O Monahan; Lynne I Wagner; Mackenzie L Shanahan; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2019-08-01

7.  Impact of high-deductible insurance on adjuvant hormonal therapy use in breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Y Lu; Fang Zhang; Anita K Wagner; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Craig C Earle; Matthew Callahan; Robert LeCates; Xin Xu; Dennis Ross-Degnan; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Introduction to the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Breast Cancer Models.

Authors:  Oguzhan Alagoz; Donald A Berry; Harry J de Koning; Eric J Feuer; Sandra J Lee; Sylvia K Plevritis; Clyde B Schechter; Natasha K Stout; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.

Authors:  István Pálka; Gyöngyi Kelemen; Katalin Ormándi; György Lázár; Tibor Nyári; László Thurzó; Zsuzsanna Kahán
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kathleen A Cronin; Stephanie Bailey; Donald A Berry; Harry J de Koning; Gerrit Draisma; Hui Huang; Sandra J Lee; Mark Munsell; Sylvia K Plevritis; Peter Ravdin; Clyde B Schechter; Bronislava Sigal; Michael A Stoto; Natasha K Stout; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; John Venier; Marvin Zelen; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.