BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) disease processes in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) may be different close to MR-visible lesions than farther from these lesions. We aimed to investigate the relationship of NAWM changes to the distance to the lesions. METHODS: We measured B(1)-corrected T1 and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) maps in 63 patients with MS (11 primary progressive, 34 relapsing-remitting, 18 secondary progressive). We used histogram analyses to assess the global properties of lesions, of 4 consecutive 1-mm pixel layers of NAWM around the lesions, and of distant NAWM located at least 4-mm from lesions in all directions. In 22 healthy controls, we measured white matter MTR and T1 histograms. Histogram parameters were statistically analyzed by using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: The first and second NAWM pixel layers around the lesions had a significantly lower MTR histogram peak position than distant NAWM, whereas T1 histogram peak position was similar between all types of NAWM. Furthermore, MTR histograms of distant NAWM were statistically indistinguishable from those of control white matter, whereas T1 histograms of distant NAWM had significantly decreased peak height for relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS and significantly increased peak position for secondary progressive MS. CONCLUSION: Our results may suggest that axonal damage and demyelination in NAWM mainly arise as a secondary result of visible lesions, with the largest effect close to these lesions. NAWM disease farther from the lesions may be mainly characterized by subtle blood-brain barrier damage, with leakage of fibrinogen into the parenchyma and microplaque formation, processes that are detected with T1 but not with MTR.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Multiple sclerosis (MS) disease processes in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) may be different close to MR-visible lesions than farther from these lesions. We aimed to investigate the relationship of NAWM changes to the distance to the lesions. METHODS: We measured B(1)-corrected T1 and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) maps in 63 patients with MS (11 primary progressive, 34 relapsing-remitting, 18 secondary progressive). We used histogram analyses to assess the global properties of lesions, of 4 consecutive 1-mm pixel layers of NAWM around the lesions, and of distant NAWM located at least 4-mm from lesions in all directions. In 22 healthy controls, we measured white matter MTR and T1 histograms. Histogram parameters were statistically analyzed by using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: The first and second NAWM pixel layers around the lesions had a significantly lower MTR histogram peak position than distant NAWM, whereas T1 histogram peak position was similar between all types of NAWM. Furthermore, MTR histograms of distant NAWM were statistically indistinguishable from those of control white matter, whereas T1 histograms of distant NAWM had significantly decreased peak height for relapsing-remitting MS and secondary progressive MS and significantly increased peak position for secondary progressive MS. CONCLUSION: Our results may suggest that axonal damage and demyelination in NAWM mainly arise as a secondary result of visible lesions, with the largest effect close to these lesions. NAWM disease farther from the lesions may be mainly characterized by subtle blood-brain barrier damage, with leakage of fibrinogen into the parenchyma and microplaque formation, processes that are detected with T1 but not with MTR.
Authors: C Mainero; N De Stefano; G Iannucci; M P Sormani; L Guidi; A Federico; M L Bartolozzi; G Comi; M Filippi Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-05-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Joseph C J Bot; Erwin L A Blezer; Wouter Kamphorst; Geert J Lycklama A Nijeholt; Herman J Ader; Jonas A Castelijns; Klaas Nicolay Ig; Elisabeth Bergers; Rivka Ravid; Chris Polman; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-09-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M A van Buchem; R I Grossman; C Armstrong; M Polansky; Y Miki; F H Heyning; M P Boncoeur-Martel; L Wei; J K Udupa; M Grossman; D L Kolson; J C McGowan Journal: Neurology Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Stefan Ropele; Massimo Filippi; Paola Valsasina; Tijmen Korteweg; Frederik Barkhof; Paul S Tofts; Rebecca Samson; David H Miller; Franz Fazekas Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Colette M Griffin; Declan T Chard; Geoff J M Parker; Gareth J Barker; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller Journal: J Neurol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: J H van Waesberghe; W Kamphorst; C J De Groot; M A van Walderveen; J A Castelijns; R Ravid; G J Lycklama à Nijeholt; P van der Valk; C H Polman; A J Thompson; F Barkhof Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Natalia M Moll; Anna M Rietsch; Smitha Thomas; Amy J Ransohoff; Jar-Chi Lee; Robert Fox; Ansi Chang; Richard M Ransohoff; Elizabeth Fisher Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alice L W Liang; Irene M Vavasour; Burkhard Mädler; Anthony L Traboulsee; Donna J Lang; David K B Li; Alex L MacKay; Cornelia Laule Journal: J Neurol Date: 2011-11-26 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: E Hattingen; A Jurcoane; M Nelles; A Müller; U Nöth; B Mädler; P Mürtz; R Deichmann; H H Schild Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Michael Amann; Athina Papadopoulou; Michaela Andelova; Stefano Magon; Nicole Mueller-Lenke; Yvonne Naegelin; Christoph Stippich; Ernst Wilhelm Radue; Oliver Bieri; Ludwig Kappos; Till Sprenger Journal: J Neurol Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Zheng Liu; Matteo Pardini; Özgür Yaldizli; Varun Sethi; Nils Muhlert; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Rebecca S Samson; David H Miller; Declan T Chard Journal: Brain Date: 2015-03-29 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Céline Louapre; Sindhuja T Govindarajan; Costanza Giannì; Christian Langkammer; Jacob A Sloane; Revere P Kinkel; Caterina Mainero Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-10-14 Impact factor: 9.910