J Christopher Gallagher1, Prema B Rapuri, Lynette M Smith. 1. Bone Metabolism Unit, Creighton University Medical Center, School of Medicine, 601 North 30th Street, Room 6718, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA. jcg@creighton.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Decreased calcitriol production due to impaired renal function may be a significant risk factor for falls in normal aging population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the association between creatinine clearance (CrCl) and the incidence of falls and fallers in groups treated with placebo, calcitriol, estrogen therapy (ET)/estrogen + progestin therapy (HT), and calcitriol + ET/HT. DESIGN: This was a 3-yr, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to test the efficacy of calcitriol and ET/HT on bone loss and falls with analysis by intention to treat and post hoc. SETTING: The study was conducted at an academic outpatient center. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighty-nine normal elderly women aged 65-77 yr; 415 women completed the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomized to placebo, calcitriol 0.25 mug twice a day, ET daily (conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg), HT (conjugated equine estrogen 0.625 mg + medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg) and calcitriol + ET/HT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative number of falls and fallers were compared between groups with 24-h urine CrCl less than 60 and 60 ml/min or greater. RESULTS:Calcitriol treatment decreased the number of fallers and falls. Low CrCl less than 60 ml/min was a predictor of the number of falls per person but not fallers in the placebo group (P = 0.007). In the low CrCl group (<60 ml/min), the rate of falls decreased on calcitriol by 53% [95% confidence interval (CI) -71% to -22%; P = 0.003], calcitriol + ET/HT by 61% (95% CI -76% to -37%; P = 0.001), and ET/HT by 25% (95% CI: -55% to +24%; not significant). Calcitriol reduced the rate of falls by 30% (95% CI -49% to -4%; P = 0.027) in the CrCl 60 ml/min or greater group. CONCLUSION:Calcitriol treatment decreases falls in all subjects but especially in elderly women with decreased renal function (<60 ml/min) and frequent fallers.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Decreased calcitriol production due to impaired renal function may be a significant risk factor for falls in normal aging population. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the association between creatinine clearance (CrCl) and the incidence of falls and fallers in groups treated with placebo, calcitriol, estrogen therapy (ET)/estrogen + progestin therapy (HT), and calcitriol + ET/HT. DESIGN: This was a 3-yr, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to test the efficacy of calcitriol and ET/HT on bone loss and falls with analysis by intention to treat and post hoc. SETTING: The study was conducted at an academic outpatient center. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred eighty-nine normal elderly women aged 65-77 yr; 415 women completed the study. INTERVENTION: Subjects were randomized to placebo, calcitriol 0.25 mug twice a day, ET daily (conjugated equine estrogens 0.625 mg), HT (conjugated equine estrogen 0.625 mg + medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg) and calcitriol + ET/HT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative number of falls and fallers were compared between groups with 24-h urine CrCl less than 60 and 60 ml/min or greater. RESULTS:Calcitriol treatment decreased the number of fallers and falls. Low CrCl less than 60 ml/min was a predictor of the number of falls per person but not fallers in the placebo group (P = 0.007). In the low CrCl group (<60 ml/min), the rate of falls decreased on calcitriol by 53% [95% confidence interval (CI) -71% to -22%; P = 0.003], calcitriol + ET/HT by 61% (95% CI -76% to -37%; P = 0.001), and ET/HT by 25% (95% CI: -55% to +24%; not significant). Calcitriol reduced the rate of falls by 30% (95% CI -49% to -4%; P = 0.027) in the CrCl 60 ml/min or greater group. CONCLUSION:Calcitriol treatment decreases falls in all subjects but especially in elderly women with decreased renal function (<60 ml/min) and frequent fallers.
Authors: A M Grant; A Avenell; M K Campbell; A M McDonald; G S MacLennan; G C McPherson; F H Anderson; C Cooper; R M Francis; C Donaldson; W J Gillespie; C M Robinson; D J Torgerson; W A Wallace Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 May 7-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M C Chapuy; R Pamphile; E Paris; C Kempf; M Schlichting; S Arnaud; P Garnero; P J Meunier Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Sidney Klawansky; Eugene Komaroff; Paul F Cavanaugh; David Y Mitchell; Matthew J Gordon; Janet E Connelly; Susan D Ross Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2003-07-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Heike A Bischoff; Hannes B Stähelin; Walter Dick; Regula Akos; Margrith Knecht; Christian Salis; Matthias Nebiker; Robert Theiler; Michael Pfeifer; Bettina Begerow; Robert A Lew; Martin Conzelmann Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Ann V Schwartz; Eric Vittinghoff; Deborah E Sellmeyer; Kenneth R Feingold; Nathalie de Rekeneire; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Ronald I Shorr; Aaron I Vinik; Michelle C Odden; Seok Won Park; Kimberly A Faulkner; Tamara B Harris Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: J A Kanis; N Burlet; C Cooper; P D Delmas; J-Y Reginster; F Borgstrom; R Rizzoli Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 4.507