Literature DB >> 17032258

Assessment of the diversity and species specificity of the mutualistic association between Epicephala moths and Glochidion trees.

Atsushi Kawakita1, Makoto Kato.   

Abstract

The obligate mutualisms between flowering plants and their seed-parasitic pollinators constitute fascinating examples of interspecific mutualisms, which are often characterized by high levels of species diversity and reciprocal species specificity. The diversification in these mutualisms has been thought to occur through simultaneous speciation of the partners, mediated by tight reciprocal adaptation; however, recent studies cast doubt over this general view. In this study, we examine the diversity and species specificity of Epicephala moths (Gracillariidae) that pollinate Glochidion trees (Phyllanthaceae), using analysis of mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of Epicephala moths associated with five Glochidion species in Japan and Taiwan reveal six genetically isolated species that are also distinguishable by male genital morphology: (i) two species specific to single host species (G. acuminatum and G. zeylanicum, respectively); (ii) two species that coexist on G. lanceolatum; and (iii) two species that share two, closely-related parapatric hosts (G. obovatum and G. rubrum). Statistical analysis shows that the two species associated with G. lanceolatum are not sister species, indicating the colonization of novel Glochidion host in at least one lineage. Behavioural observations suggest that all six species possess the actively-pollinating habit, thus none of the studied species has become a nonmutualistic 'cheater' that exploits the benefit resulting from pollination by other species. Our results parallel recent findings in ecologically similar associations, namely the fig-fig wasp and yucca-yucca moth mutualisms, and contribute to a more general understanding of the factors that determine ecological and evolutionary outcomes in these mutualisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17032258     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03037.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  22 in total

1.  Mutualism favours higher host specificity than does antagonism in plant-herbivore interaction.

Authors:  Atsushi Kawakita; Tomoko Okamoto; Ryutaro Goto; Makoto Kato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A selective fungal transport organ (mycangium) maintains coarse phylogenetic congruence between fungus-farming ambrosia beetles and their symbionts.

Authors:  James Skelton; Andrew J Johnson; Michelle A Jusino; Craig C Bateman; You Li; Jiri Hulcr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Repeated independent evolution of obligate pollination mutualism in the Phyllantheae-Epicephala association.

Authors:  Atsushi Kawakita; Makoto Kato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Non-congruent colonizations and diversification in a coevolving pollination mutualism on oceanic islands.

Authors:  David H Hembry; Atsushi Kawakita; Neil E Gurr; Mark A Schmaedick; Bruce G Baldwin; Rosemary G Gillespie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Repeated colonization of remote islands by specialized mutualists.

Authors:  David H Hembry; Tomoko Okamoto; Rosemary G Gillespie
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Coevolution with pollinating resin midges led to resin-filled nurseries in the androecia, gynoecia and tepals of Kadsura (Schisandraceae).

Authors:  Shi-Xiao Luo; Ting-Ting Liu; Fei Cui; Zi-Yin Yang; Xiao-Ying Hu; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  How to become a yucca moth: Minimal trait evolution needed to establish the obligate pollination mutualism.

Authors:  Jeremy B Yoder; Christopher Irwin Smith; Olle Pellmyr
Journal:  Biol J Linn Soc Lond       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.138

8.  Allopatric distribution and diversification without niche shift in a bryophyte-feeding basal moth lineage (Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae).

Authors:  Yume Imada; Atsushi Kawakita; Makoto Kato
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Diversification and coevolution in brood pollination mutualisms: Windows into the role of biotic interactions in generating biological diversity.

Authors:  David H Hembry; David M Althoff
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.844

10.  A Novel, Enigmatic Basal Leafflower Moth Lineage Pollinating a Derived Leafflower Host Illustrates the Dynamics of Host Shifts, Partner Replacement, and Apparent Coadaptation in Intimate Mutualisms.

Authors:  Shi-Xiao Luo; Gang Yao; Ziwei Wang; Dianxiang Zhang; David H Hembry
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.