BACKGROUND: In this preparatory phase of a case-control study, we propose and evaluate a new tool for classifying surgical procedures (SPs) in categories useful for epidemiologic research on surgical transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD). METHODS: All SPs reported to the Swedish National Hospital Discharge Registry in the period 1974-2002, and undergone by 212 Swedish patients with registered diagnosis of CJD at death, hospital discharge or notification, in the period 1987-2002, 1060 age-, sex- and residence-matched controls and 1340 randomly chosen population controls, were reclassified into one of six categories of hypothetical transmission risk level. For that purpose the following two attributes were used: non-disposable instruments involved; and highest assigned ad-hoc risk level for four tissues or anatomical structures contacting such instruments. RESULTS: A total of 1170 different SP codes were reclassified as follows: 3.1% in the high-risk, 59.1% in the lower-risk, 24.4% in the lowest-risk, and 2.1% in the no-risk groups, with 11.3% procedures negatively defined by rubric as "other than..." being assigned to two spurious diluted-high and diluted-lower risk categories. The high-risk group mainly comprised neurosurgical (53%) and ophthalmic (39%) procedures. Sensitivity of neurosurgery and of ophthalmic surgery excluding neurosurgery, for the high- and diluted-high risk vs. other categories was 46% and 84%, while specificity was 98% and 95%, respectively. Sensitivity analysis based on these indices revealed that non-significant odds ratio effects of 1.4 and 1.3 for neurosurgery and ophthalmic surgery corresponded to statistically significant values of 5.1 after reclassification. CONCLUSIONS: This classification might contribute to quantify effects masked by use of body-system SP-categories in case-control studies on sCJD transmission by surgery.
BACKGROUND: In this preparatory phase of a case-control study, we propose and evaluate a new tool for classifying surgical procedures (SPs) in categories useful for epidemiologic research on surgical transmission of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD). METHODS: All SPs reported to the Swedish National Hospital Discharge Registry in the period 1974-2002, and undergone by 212 Swedish patients with registered diagnosis of CJD at death, hospital discharge or notification, in the period 1987-2002, 1060 age-, sex- and residence-matched controls and 1340 randomly chosen population controls, were reclassified into one of six categories of hypothetical transmission risk level. For that purpose the following two attributes were used: non-disposable instruments involved; and highest assigned ad-hoc risk level for four tissues or anatomical structures contacting such instruments. RESULTS: A total of 1170 different SP codes were reclassified as follows: 3.1% in the high-risk, 59.1% in the lower-risk, 24.4% in the lowest-risk, and 2.1% in the no-risk groups, with 11.3% procedures negatively defined by rubric as "other than..." being assigned to two spurious diluted-high and diluted-lower risk categories. The high-risk group mainly comprised neurosurgical (53%) and ophthalmic (39%) procedures. Sensitivity of neurosurgery and of ophthalmic surgery excluding neurosurgery, for the high- and diluted-high risk vs. other categories was 46% and 84%, while specificity was 98% and 95%, respectively. Sensitivity analysis based on these indices revealed that non-significant odds ratio effects of 1.4 and 1.3 for neurosurgery and ophthalmic surgery corresponded to statistically significant values of 5.1 after reclassification. CONCLUSIONS: This classification might contribute to quantify effects masked by use of body-system SP-categories in case-control studies on sCJD transmission by surgery.
Authors: I Zerr; J P Brandel; C Masullo; D Wientjens; R de Silva; M Zeidler; E Granieri; S Sampaolo; C van Duijn; N Delasnerie-Lauprêtre; R Will; S Poser Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: P Brown; M Preece; J P Brandel; T Sato; L McShane; I Zerr; A Fletcher; R G Will; M Pocchiari; N R Cashman; J H d'Aignaux; L Cervenáková; J Fradkin; L B Schonberger; S J Collins Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-10-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C M van Duijn; N Delasnerie-Lauprêtre; C Masullo; I Zerr; R de Silva; D P Wientjens; J P Brandel; T Weber; V Bonavita; M Zeidler; A Alpérovitch; S Poser; E Granieri; A Hofman; R G Will Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-04-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Alberto Rábano; Jesús de Pedro-Cuesta; Kåre Mølbak; Ake Siden; Miguel Calero; Henning Laursen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2005-01-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jesús de Pedro-Cuesta; Ignacio Mahillo-Fernandez; Miguel Calero; Alberto Rábano; Mabel Cruz; Åke Siden; Pablo Martínez-Martín; Henning Laursen; María Ruiz-Tovar; Kåre Mølbak Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 3.240