BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The anticancer drugs doxorubicin and bleomycin are well-known for their oxidative stress-mediated side effects in heart and lung, respectively. It is frequently suggested that iron is involved in doxorubicin and bleomycin toxicity. We set out to elucidate whether iron chelation prevents the oxidative stress-mediated toxicity of doxorubicin and bleomycin and whether it affects their antiproliferative/proapoptotic effects. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Cell culture experiments were performed in A549 cells. Formation of hydroxyl radicals was measured in vitro by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). We investigated interactions between five iron chelators and the oxidative stress-inducing agents (doxorubicin, bleomycin and H(2)O(2)) by quantifying oxidative stress and cellular damage as TBARS formation, glutathione (GSH) consumption and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage. The antitumour/proapoptotic effects of doxorubicin and bleomycin were assessed by cell proliferation and caspase-3 activity assay. KEY RESULTS: All the tested chelators, except for monohydroxyethylrutoside (monoHER), prevented hydroxyl radical formation induced by H(2)O(2)/Fe(2+) in EPR studies. However, only salicylaldehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone and deferoxamine protected intact A549 cells against H(2)O(2)/Fe(2+). Conversely, the chelators that decreased doxorubicin and bleomycin-induced oxidative stress and cellular damage (dexrazoxane, monoHER) were not able to protect against H(2)O(2)/Fe(2+). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We have shown that the ability to chelate iron as such is not the sole determinant of a compound protecting against doxorubicin or bleomycin-induced cytotoxicity. Our data challenge the putative role of iron and hydroxyl radicals in the oxidative stress-mediated cytotoxicity of doxorubicin and bleomycin and have implications for the development of new compounds to protects against this toxicity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The anticancer drugs doxorubicin and bleomycin are well-known for their oxidative stress-mediated side effects in heart and lung, respectively. It is frequently suggested that iron is involved in doxorubicin and bleomycintoxicity. We set out to elucidate whether iron chelation prevents the oxidative stress-mediated toxicity of doxorubicin and bleomycin and whether it affects their antiproliferative/proapoptotic effects. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Cell culture experiments were performed in A549 cells. Formation of hydroxyl radicals was measured in vitro by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). We investigated interactions between five iron chelators and the oxidative stress-inducing agents (doxorubicin, bleomycin and H(2)O(2)) by quantifying oxidative stress and cellular damage as TBARS formation, glutathione (GSH) consumption and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage. The antitumour/proapoptotic effects of doxorubicin and bleomycin were assessed by cell proliferation and caspase-3 activity assay. KEY RESULTS: All the tested chelators, except for monohydroxyethylrutoside (monoHER), prevented hydroxyl radical formation induced by H(2)O(2)/Fe(2+) in EPR studies. However, only salicylaldehyde isonicotinoyl hydrazone and deferoxamine protected intact A549 cells against H(2)O(2)/Fe(2+). Conversely, the chelators that decreased doxorubicin and bleomycin-induced oxidative stress and cellular damage (dexrazoxane, monoHER) were not able to protect against H(2)O(2)/Fe(2+). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: We have shown that the ability to chelate iron as such is not the sole determinant of a compound protecting against doxorubicin or bleomycin-induced cytotoxicity. Our data challenge the putative role of iron and hydroxyl radicals in the oxidative stress-mediated cytotoxicity of doxorubicin and bleomycin and have implications for the development of new compounds to protects against this toxicity.
Authors: S A van Acker; D J van den Berg; M N Tromp; D H Griffioen; W P van Bennekom; W J van der Vijgh; A Bast Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 1996 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Andres A Caro; Ava Commissariat; Caroline Dunn; Hyunjoo Kim; Salvador Lorente García; Allen Smith; Harrison Strang; Jake Stuppy; Linda P Desrochers; Thomas E Goodwin Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2015-08-11
Authors: V R Vásquez-Garzón; A Ramírez-Cosmes; E Reyes-Jiménez; G Carrasco-Torres; S Hernández-García; S R Aguilar-Ruiz; H Torres-Aguilar; J Alpuche; L Pérez-Campos Mayoral; S Pina-Canseco; J Arellanes-Robledo; S Villa-Treviño; R Baltiérrez-Hoyos Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: M Sereno; A Brunello; A Chiappori; J Barriuso; E Casado; C Belda; J de Castro; J Feliu; M González-Barón Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: T Simůnek; M Sterba; O Popelová; H Kaiserová; M Adamcová; M Hroch; P Hasková; P Ponka; V Gersl Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: O Popelová; M Sterba; P Hasková; T Simůnek; M Hroch; I Guncová; P Nachtigal; M Adamcová; V Gersl; Y Mazurová Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 7.640