Literature DB >> 17028983

Changes in risk of death from breast cancer with season and latitude: sun exposure and breast cancer survival in Norway.

Alina Carmen Porojnicu1, Zoya Lagunova, Trude Eid Robsahm, Jens Petter Berg, Arne Dahlback, Johan Moan.   

Abstract

The Norwegian counties can conveniently be divided in three groups with different annual UV exposures and different incidence rates of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin. In view of the hypothesis that latitude and season of diagnosis may play a role for breast cancer progression, the prognosis of breast cancer as determined for summer and winter diagnosis, were evaluated in the three residential regions. Two age groups were analysed separately (stratification at 50 years). For all regions, and for all ages, the prognosis was best for women diagnosed in the summer season (Relative risk (RR) of death was 15-25% lower for summer diagnosis versus winter diagnosis). There was no significant seasonal variation of the number of new cases. For women diagnosed before the age of 50, a geographical gradient in cancer prognosis was also found (RR of death 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.7 for cases diagnosed in southeast Norway and RR of death 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.1 for diagnosis in the north of Norway). This is in agreement with a 1.5 times larger annual UV exposures and 3-4 times larger incidence rates of SCC in the southeast region when compared with the north region. For women diagnosed after the age of 50, no significant difference was found between the three regions. Despite a 17% higher vitamin D intake from food in north of Norway no difference in cancer survival was found for diagnosis during winter (when no significant differences in the levels of UV exposure can be detected between regions). The overall data support our earlier hypothesis that season of diagnosis and therapy start improves the survival for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028983     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9331-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  21 in total

1.  The association between breast cancer prognostic indicators and serum 25-OH vitamin D levels.

Authors:  Luke J Peppone; Aaron S Rickles; Michelle C Janelsins; Michael R Insalaco; Kristin A Skinner
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  How I treat vitamin d deficiency.

Authors:  Qamar J Khan; Carol J Fabian
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Association between non-melanoma and melanoma skin cancer rates, vitamin D and latitude.

Authors:  Miguel Rivas; Elisa Rojas; Gloria M Calaf; Marcela Barberán; Claudio Liberman; Marcelo De Paula Correa
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease and cancer: not too much and not too little? The need for clinical trials.

Authors:  Michal L Melamed; JoAnn E Manson
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2011-07

Review 5.  Vitamin D and breast cancer.

Authors:  Theresa Shao; Paula Klein; Michael L Grossbard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-01-10

Review 6.  Ultraviolet radiation and its effects on pregnancy: A review study.

Authors:  Malihe Botyar; Rozita Khoramroudi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2018 May-Jun

7.  The effect of various vitamin D supplementation regimens in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Luke J Peppone; Alissa J Huston; Mary E Reid; Randy N Rosier; Yousef Zakharia; Donald L Trump; Karen M Mustian; Michelle C Janelsins; Jason Q Purnell; Gary R Morrow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Time trends and latitude dependence of uveal and cutaneous malignant melanoma induced by solar radiation.

Authors:  Johan Moan; Emanuela Cicarma; Richard Setlow; Alina C Porojnicu; William B Grant; Asta Juzeniene
Journal:  Dermatoendocrinol       Date:  2010-01

Review 9.  Vitamin D in cutaneous carcinogenesis: part I.

Authors:  Jean Y Tang; Teresa Fu; Christopher Lau; Dennis H Oh; Daniel D Bikle; Maryam M Asgari
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  How strong is the evidence that solar ultraviolet B and vitamin D reduce the risk of cancer?: An examination using Hill's criteria for causality.

Authors:  William B Grant
Journal:  Dermatoendocrinol       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.