Literature DB >> 17028887

Adaptive-filtering of trisomy 21: risk of Down syndrome depends on family size and age of previous child.

Markus Neuhäuser1, Sven Krackow.   

Abstract

The neonatal incidence rate of Down syndrome (DS) is well-known to accelerate strongly with maternal age. This non-linearity renders mere accumulation of defects at recombination during prolonged first meiotic prophase implausible as an explanation for DS rate increase with maternal age, but might be anticipated from chromosomal drive (CD) for trisomy 21. Alternatively, as there is selection against genetically disadvantaged embryos, the screening system that eliminates embryos with trisomy 21 might decay with maternal age. In this paper, we provide the first evidence for relaxed filtering stringency (RFS) to represent an adaptive maternal response that could explain accelerating DS rates with maternal age. Using historical data, we show that the proportion of aberrant live births decrease with increased family size in older mothers, that inter-birth intervals are longer before affected neonates than before normal ones, and that primiparae exhibit elevated levels of DS incidence at higher age. These findings are predicted by adaptive RFS but cannot be explained by the currently available alternative non-adaptive hypotheses, including CD. The identification of the relaxation control mechanism and therapeutic restoration of a stringent screen may have considerable medical implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17028887     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-006-0165-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of models of maternal age-specific risk for Down syndrome live births.

Authors:  J K Morris; N J Wald; D E Mutton; E Alberman
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Invited commentary: Parity and the risk of Down's syndrome--caution in interpretation.

Authors:  Annabelle Chan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Risk of a Down syndrome live birth in women 45 years of age and older.

Authors:  J K Morris; C De Vigan; D E Mutton; E Alberman
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Human pregnancy filtering: yesterday's news?

Authors:  S Krackow
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Chromosomal drive and the evolution of meiotic nondisjunction and trisomy in humans.

Authors:  T Day; P D Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Independent effects of maternal age and birth order on the incidence of selected congenital malformations.

Authors:  S Hay; H Barbano
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1972-12

7.  Attrition of trisomies as a maternal screening device. An explanation of the association of trisomy 21 with maternal age.

Authors:  Z Stein; W Stein; M Susser
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The evolutionary biology of spontaneous abortion in humans.

Authors:  L S Forbes
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Origin of nondisjunction in trisomy 21 syndrome: all studies compiled, parental age analysis, and international comparisons.

Authors:  R C Juberg; P N Mowrey
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1983-09

10.  HYPOTHESES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF EXCESS ZYGOTES: MODELS OF BET-HEDGING AND SELECTIVE ABORTION.

Authors:  Jan Kozlowski; Stephen C Stearns
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  3 in total

1.  A test of maternal human chorionic gonadotropin during pregnancy as an adaptive filter of human gestations.

Authors:  Tim A Bruckner; Katherine B Saxton; Michelle Pearl; Robert Currier; Martin Kharrazi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Transmission of trisomy decreases with maternal age in mouse models of Down syndrome, mirroring a phenomenon in human Down syndrome mothers.

Authors:  Shani Stern; David Biron; Elisha Moses
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 3.  Selection in utero and population health: Theory and typology of research.

Authors:  Tim A Bruckner; Ralph Catalano
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2018-06-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.