OBJECTIVE: Our work evaluated the potential role of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) serum levels with respect to that of conventional serum tumour markers, CEA and CA 15-3, in monitoring the course of metastatic breast cancer in 56 female patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS: VEGF and bFGF concentrations were determined using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each marker and of marker combinations for different types of clinical response was calculated. RESULTS: The highest PPV for overall disease control was shown by bFGF (70%), which also showed the highest PPV for both partial response (36.4%) and stable disease (63.2%). CEA showed the highest predictive value for progression (69.2%). A combined increase in CEA and bFGF or VEGF was associated with disease progression in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Information provided by angiogenic factor levels seems to be independent of and is possibly complementary to that provided by conventional serum markers. bFGF showed the maximum predictive value for disease control and provided additional information to that obtained from CEA or CA 15-3 evaluation. It could therefore be a promising candidate for monitoring response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
OBJECTIVE: Our work evaluated the potential role of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) serum levels with respect to that of conventional serum tumour markers, CEA and CA 15-3, in monitoring the course of metastatic breast cancer in 56 female patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS:VEGF and bFGF concentrations were determined using a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each marker and of marker combinations for different types of clinical response was calculated. RESULTS: The highest PPV for overall disease control was shown by bFGF (70%), which also showed the highest PPV for both partial response (36.4%) and stable disease (63.2%). CEA showed the highest predictive value for progression (69.2%). A combined increase in CEA and bFGF or VEGF was associated with disease progression in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Information provided by angiogenic factor levels seems to be independent of and is possibly complementary to that provided by conventional serum markers. bFGF showed the maximum predictive value for disease control and provided additional information to that obtained from CEA or CA 15-3 evaluation. It could therefore be a promising candidate for monitoring response to chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Jan Rykala; Karolina Przybylowska; Ireneusz Majsterek; Grazyna Pasz-Walczak; Andrzej Sygut; Adam Dziki; Piotr Kuna Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 3.318