Literature DB >> 17027853

In silico approaches reveal the potential for DNA sequence-dependent histone octamer affinity to influence chromatin structure in vivo.

Ross M Fraser1, James Allan, Martin W Simmen.   

Abstract

Nucleosome positioning signals embedded within the DNA sequence have the potential to influence the detailed structure of the higher-order chromatin fibre. In two previous studies of long stretches of DNA, encompassing the chicken beta-globin and ovine beta-lactoglobulin genes, respectively, we mapped the relative affinity of every site for the core histone octamer. In both cases a periodic arrangement of the in vitro positioning sites suggests that they might influence the folding of a nucleosome chain into higher-order structure; this hypothesis was borne out in the case of the beta-lactoglobulin gene, where the distribution of the in vitro positioning sites is related to the positions nucleosomes actually occupy in sheep liver cells. Here, we have exploited the in vitro nucleosome positioning datasets to simulate nucleosomal organisation using in silico approaches. We use the high-resolution, quantitative positioning maps to define a one-dimensional positioning energy lattice, which can be populated with a defined number of nucleosomes. Monte Carlo techniques are employed to simulate the behaviour of the model at equilibrium to produce a set of configurations, which provide a probability-based occupancy map. Employing a variety of techniques we show that the occupancy maps are a sensitive function of the histone octamer density (nucleosome repeat length) and find that a minimal change in this property can produce dramatic localised changes in structure. Although simulations generally give rise to regular periodic nucleosomal arrangements, they often show octamer density-dependent discontinuities, which tend to co-localise with sequences that adopt distinctive chromatin structure in vivo. Furthermore, the overall organisation of simulated chromatin structures are more closely related to the situation in vivo than is the original in vitro positioning data, particularly at a nucleosome density corresponding to the in vivo state. Although our model is simplified, we argue that it provides a unique insight into the influence that DNA sequence can have in determining chromatin structure and could serve as a useful basis for the incorporation of other parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17027853     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  5 in total

Review 1.  What does physics have to do with cancer?

Authors:  Franziska Michor; Jan Liphardt; Mauro Ferrari; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 2.  What controls nucleosome positions?

Authors:  Eran Segal; Jonathan Widom
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 11.639

3.  A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organization.

Authors:  Triantaffyllos Gkikopoulos; Pieta Schofield; Vijender Singh; Marina Pinskaya; Jane Mellor; Michaela Smolle; Jerry L Workman; Geoffrey J Barton; Tom Owen-Hughes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Weakly positioned nucleosomes enhance the transcriptional competency of chromatin.

Authors:  Yaakov Belch; Jingyi Yang; Yang Liu; Sridhar A Malkaram; Rong Liu; Jean-Jack M Riethoven; Istvan Ladunga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A comparison of in vitro nucleosome positioning mapped with chicken, frog and a variety of yeast core histones.

Authors:  James Allan; Ross M Fraser; Tom Owen-Hughes; Kevin Docherty; Vijender Singh
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.